From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from eu-smtp-delivery-178.mimecast.com (eu-smtp-delivery-178.mimecast.com [207.82.80.178]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 431645F59 for ; Fri, 16 Mar 2018 16:15:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from ex-uknb-01.ad.s-a-m.com (83-244-203-18.cust-83.exponential-e.net [83.244.203.18]) (Using TLS) by eu-smtp-1.mimecast.com with ESMTP id uk-mta-50-QSAjKvPcO72eDhhzHWnYNQ-1; Fri, 16 Mar 2018 15:15:00 +0000 Received: from EX-UKHA-01.ad.s-a-m.com ([fe80::bd21:e36b:5bf6:8ca8]) by EX-UKHA-01.ad.s-a-m.com ([fe80::bd21:e36b:5bf6:8ca8%11]) with mapi id 14.03.0361.001; Fri, 16 Mar 2018 15:14:59 +0000 From: Richard Nutman To: "users@dpdk.org" Thread-Topic: mlx5 fails to probe on 16.11.5 Thread-Index: AdO9OYwFwrNm5sjyQl+9/qEHGJMBUQ== Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2018 15:14:58 +0000 Message-ID: <733AB18813E3864094592CC5191B172A235BBFE4@EX-UKHA-01.ad.s-a-m.com> Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [172.19.77.57] x-esetresult: clean, is OK x-esetid: 37303A29F33CD062657C6B MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MC-Unique: QSAjKvPcO72eDhhzHWnYNQ-1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: [dpdk-users] mlx5 fails to probe on 16.11.5 X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2018 15:15:10 -0000 Hi all, I tried switching from the Mellanox 16.11.4 release to the official DPDK LT= S 16.11.5, but having issues getting it to work. rte_eth_dev_count() returns 0, as mlx5_pci_probe() is never called from rte= _eal_pci_probe_one_driver(). Anyone any idea what that would be ? Works fine in previous Mellanox relea= ses. Using Centos 7.2, Ofed 4.2-1. Also in mlx5_ethdev.c -> mlx5_dev_infos_get() info->flow_type_rss_offloads =3D ~MLX5_RSS_HF_MASK;=20 was added as part of the .5 release, but the mask is undefined and fails to= build. Thanks, Richard Nutman =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=0A------------------------------------------= ---------------------------------------------=0AThis email has been scanned= for email related threats and delivered safely by Mimecast.=0AFor more inf= ormation please visit http://www.mimecast.com=0A---------------------------= ------------------------------------------------------------=0A