From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 346FBA09EE for ; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 22:29:35 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92397AC9E; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 22:29:33 +0100 (CET) Received: from wh10.alp1.flow.ch (wh10.alp1.flow.ch [185.119.84.194]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76136AC9C for ; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 22:29:32 +0100 (CET) Received: from [::1] (port=44772 helo=wh10.alp1.flow.ch) by wh10.alp1.flow.ch with esmtpa (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1knpyk-00H41P-NL; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 22:29:30 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2020 22:29:25 +0100 From: Alex Kiselev To: "Singh, Jasvinder" Cc: users@dpdk.org, "Dumitrescu, Cristian" , "Dharmappa, Savinay" In-Reply-To: References: <090256f7b7a6739f80353be3339fd062@therouter.net> <7e314aa3562c380a573781a4c0562b93@therouter.net> <4d1beb6eb85896bef1e5a1b9778006d7@therouter.net> , <49019BC8-DDA6-4B39-B395-2A68E91AB424@intel.com> <226b13286c876e69ad40a65858131b66@therouter.net> <4536a02973015dc8049834635f145a19@therouter.net>, , <4e5bde1cf78b0f77f4a5ec016a7217d6@therouter.net> <5FD54115-155E-4492-B1D6-041C8782BB8E@intel.com> <33e4de48a732dc6d3c8ec24353b03348@therouter.net> Message-ID: <7a4249048e300bc0947689702d9571be@therouter.net> X-Sender: alex@therouter.net User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.3.8 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - wh10.alp1.flow.ch X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - dpdk.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - therouter.net X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: wh10.alp1.flow.ch: authenticated_id: alex@therouter.net X-Authenticated-Sender: wh10.alp1.flow.ch: alex@therouter.net X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] scheduler issue X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: users-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "users" On 2020-12-08 14:24, Singh, Jasvinder wrote: > > >> > [JS] now, returning to 1 mbps pipes situation, try reducing tc period >> > first at subport and then at pipe level, if that help in getting even >> > traffic across low bandwidth pipes. >> >> reducing subport tc from 10 to 5 period also solved the problem with 1 >> Mbit/s pipes. >> >> so, my second problem has been solved, >> but the first one with some of low bandwidth pipes stop transmitting >> still >> remains. >> > > I see, try removing "pkt_len <= pipe_tc_ov_credits" condition in the > grinder_credits_check() code for oversubscription case, instead use > this pkt_len <= pipe_tc_credits + pipe_tc_ov_credits; if I do what you suggest, I will get this code enough_credits = (pkt_len <= subport_tb_credits) && (pkt_len <= subport_tc_credits) && (pkt_len <= pipe_tb_credits) && (pkt_len <= pipe_tc_credits) && (pkt_len <= pipe_tc_credits + pipe_tc_ov_credits); And this doesn't make sense since if condition pkt_len <= pipe_tc_credits is true then condition (pkt_len <= pipe_tc_credits + pipe_tc_ov_credits) is also always true. Your suggestion just turns off TC_OV feature. > > >> > >> > >> > >> >>> rcv 0 rx rate 7324160 nb pkts 5722 >> >>> rcv 1 rx rate 7281920 nb pkts 5689 >> >>> rcv 2 rx rate 7226880 nb pkts 5646 >> >>> rcv 3 rx rate 7124480 nb pkts 5566 >> >>> rcv 4 rx rate 7324160 nb pkts 5722 >> >>> rcv 5 rx rate 7271680 nb pkts 5681 >> >>> rcv 6 rx rate 7188480 nb pkts 5616 >> >>> rcv 7 rx rate 7150080 nb pkts 5586 >> >>> rcv 8 rx rate 7328000 nb pkts 5725 >> >>> rcv 9 rx rate 7249920 nb pkts 5664 >> >>> rcv 10 rx rate 7188480 nb pkts 5616 rcv 11 rx rate 7179520 nb pkts >> >>> 5609 rcv 12 rx rate 7324160 nb pkts 5722 rcv 13 rx rate 7208960 nb >> >>> pkts 5632 rcv 14 rx rate 7152640 nb pkts 5588 rcv 15 rx rate >> >>> 7127040 nb pkts 5568 rcv 16 rx rate 7303680 nb pkts 5706 .... >> >>> rcv 587 rx rate 2406400 nb pkts 1880 rcv 588 rx rate 2406400 nb pkts >> >>> 1880 rcv 589 rx rate 2406400 nb pkts 1880 rcv 590 rx rate 2406400 nb >> >>> pkts 1880 rcv 591 rx rate 2406400 nb pkts 1880 rcv 592 rx rate >> >>> 2398720 nb pkts 1874 rcv 593 rx rate 2400000 nb pkts 1875 rcv 594 rx >> >>> rate 2400000 nb pkts 1875 rcv 595 rx rate 2400000 nb pkts 1875 rcv >> >>> 596 rx rate 2401280 nb pkts 1876 rcv 597 rx rate 2401280 nb pkts >> >>> 1876 rcv 598 rx rate 2401280 nb pkts 1876 rcv 599 rx rate 2402560 nb >> >>> pkts 1877 rx rate sum 3156416000 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>> ... despite that there is _NO_ congestion... >> >>>>> congestion at the subport or pipe. >> >>>>>> And the subport !! doesn't use about 42 mbit/s of available >> >>>>>> bandwidth. >> >>>>>> The only difference is those test configurations is TC of >> >>>>>> generated traffic. >> >>>>>> Test 1 uses TC 1 while test 2 uses TC 3 (which is use TC_OV >> >>>>>> function). >> >>>>>> So, enabling TC_OV changes the results dramatically. >> >>>>>> ## >> >>>>>> ## test1 >> >>>>>> ## >> >>>>>> hqos add profile 7 rate 2 M size 1000000 tc period 40 >> >>>>>> # qos test port >> >>>>>> hqos add port 1 rate 10 G mtu 1522 frame overhead 24 queue sizes >> >>>>>> 64 64 64 64 >> >>>>>> hqos add port 1 subport 0 rate 300 M size 1000000 tc period 10 >> >>>>>> hqos add port 1 subport 0 pipes 2000 profile 7 hqos add port 1 >> >>>>>> subport 0 pipes 200 profile 23 hqos set port 1 lcore 3 port 1 >> >>>>>> subport rate 300 M number of tx flows 300 generator tx rate 1M TC >> >>>>>> 1 ... >> >>>>>> rcv 284 rx rate 995840 nb pkts 778 rcv 285 rx rate 995840 nb >> >>>>>> pkts 778 rcv 286 rx rate 995840 nb pkts 778 rcv 287 rx rate >> >>>>>> 995840 nb pkts 778 rcv 288 rx rate 995840 nb pkts 778 rcv 289 >> >>>>>> rx rate 995840 nb pkts 778 rcv 290 rx rate 995840 nb pkts 778 >> >>>>>> rcv 291 rx rate 995840 nb pkts 778 rcv 292 rx rate 995840 nb >> >>>>>> pkts 778 rcv 293 rx rate 995840 nb pkts 778 rcv 294 rx rate >> >>>>>> 995840 nb pkts 778 ... >> >>>>>> sum pipe's rx rate is 298 494 720 OK. >> >>>>>> The subport rate is equally distributed to 300 pipes. >> >>>>>> ## >> >>>>>> ## test 2 >> >>>>>> ## >> >>>>>> hqos add profile 7 rate 2 M size 1000000 tc period 40 >> >>>>>> # qos test port >> >>>>>> hqos add port 1 rate 10 G mtu 1522 frame overhead 24 queue sizes >> >>>>>> 64 64 64 64 >> >>>>>> hqos add port 1 subport 0 rate 300 M size 1000000 tc period 10 >> >>>>>> hqos add port 1 subport 0 pipes 2000 profile 7 hqos add port 1 >> >>>>>> subport 0 pipes 200 profile 23 hqos set port 1 lcore 3 port 1 >> >>>>>> subport rate 300 M number of tx flows 300 generator tx rate 1M TC >> >>>>>> 3 >> >>>>>> h5 ~ # rcli sh qos rcv >> >>>>>> rcv 0 rx rate 875520 nb pkts 684 >> >>>>>> rcv 1 rx rate 856320 nb pkts 669 >> >>>>>> rcv 2 rx rate 849920 nb pkts 664 >> >>>>>> rcv 3 rx rate 853760 nb pkts 667 >> >>>>>> rcv 4 rx rate 867840 nb pkts 678 >> >>>>>> rcv 5 rx rate 844800 nb pkts 660 >> >>>>>> rcv 6 rx rate 852480 nb pkts 666 >> >>>>>> rcv 7 rx rate 855040 nb pkts 668 >> >>>>>> rcv 8 rx rate 865280 nb pkts 676 >> >>>>>> rcv 9 rx rate 846080 nb pkts 661 >> >>>>>> rcv 10 rx rate 858880 nb pkts 671 rcv 11 rx rate 870400 nb >> >>>>>> pkts 680 rcv 12 rx rate 864000 nb pkts 675 rcv 13 rx rate >> >>>>>> 852480 nb pkts 666 rcv 14 rx rate 855040 nb pkts 668 rcv 15 >> >>>>>> rx rate 857600 nb pkts 670 rcv 16 rx rate 864000 nb pkts 675 >> >>>>>> rcv 17 rx rate 866560 nb pkts 677 rcv 18 rx rate 865280 nb >> >>>>>> pkts 676 rcv 19 rx rate 858880 nb pkts 671 rcv 20 rx rate >> >>>>>> 856320 nb pkts 669 rcv 21 rx rate 864000 nb pkts 675 rcv 22 >> >>>>>> rx rate 869120 nb pkts 679 rcv 23 rx rate 856320 nb pkts 669 >> >>>>>> rcv 24 rx rate 862720 nb pkts 674 rcv 25 rx rate 865280 nb >> >>>>>> pkts 676 rcv 26 rx rate 867840 nb pkts 678 rcv 27 rx rate >> >>>>>> 870400 nb pkts 680 rcv 28 rx rate 860160 nb pkts 672 rcv 29 >> >>>>>> rx rate 870400 nb pkts 680 rcv 30 rx rate 869120 nb pkts 679 >> >>>>>> rcv 31 rx rate 870400 nb pkts 680 rcv 32 rx rate 858880 nb >> >>>>>> pkts 671 rcv 33 rx rate 858880 nb pkts 671 rcv 34 rx rate >> >>>>>> 852480 nb pkts 666 rcv 35 rx rate 874240 nb pkts 683 rcv 36 >> >>>>>> rx rate 855040 nb pkts 668 rcv 37 rx rate 853760 nb pkts 667 >> >>>>>> rcv 38 rx rate 869120 nb pkts 679 rcv 39 rx rate 885760 nb >> >>>>>> pkts 692 rcv 40 rx rate 861440 nb pkts 673 rcv 41 rx rate >> >>>>>> 852480 nb pkts 666 rcv 42 rx rate 871680 nb pkts 681 ... >> >>>>>> ... >> >>>>>> rcv 288 rx rate 766720 nb pkts 599 rcv 289 rx rate 766720 nb >> >>>>>> pkts 599 rcv 290 rx rate 766720 nb pkts 599 rcv 291 rx rate >> >>>>>> 766720 nb pkts 599 rcv 292 rx rate 762880 nb pkts 596 rcv 293 >> >>>>>> rx rate 762880 nb pkts 596 rcv 294 rx rate 762880 nb pkts 596 >> >>>>>> rcv 295 rx rate 760320 nb pkts 594 rcv 296 rx rate 604160 nb >> >>>>>> pkts 472 rcv 297 rx rate 604160 nb pkts 472 rcv 298 rx rate >> >>>>>> 604160 nb pkts 472 rcv 299 rx rate 604160 nb pkts 472 rx rate >> >>>>>> sum 258839040 FAILED. >> >>>>>> The subport rate is distributed NOT equally between 300 pipes. >> >>>>>> Some subport bandwith (about 42) is not being used!