From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A02642B57 for ; Sat, 20 May 2023 23:31:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04F1F42BC9; Sat, 20 May 2023 23:31:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-ej1-f52.google.com (mail-ej1-f52.google.com [209.85.218.52]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A950940395 for ; Sat, 20 May 2023 23:31:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-ej1-f52.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-96f7377c86aso330621866b.1 for ; Sat, 20 May 2023 14:31:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1684618263; x=1687210263; h=content-transfer-encoding:subject:from:to:content-language :user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=dvi1EKRlvfGk1PQqCwp+Hj7UaK94bmEZOshTj+u4Pqc=; b=TX5ZchhxoWuUBqrONZU5q48Fqy5esyHfA3fyxze81TcTS+iE2EiXKKtdlkWjglmqIO kJ5tMOGL7r57WHbDfkXzBNVSpKVPcCrBgWbWxkEExAmRLg8f+SbFXTijBt68BKf00Ei8 y7yNaaF4imflVrAf3HfegVGtQc84Eu91KHyT7NqWZj3rZvoyZJ+BEGEGEqdNVz5qhYYy /BvN1c/mX/KW3ewzzl+ea0DhwjoCw6QnXuHIjX4zQgAFt4lDresKitJdDHvFyqOU4FCg MgnI8QPRYASxwIcsOtm1vyVxhGL2AFKB7t8XIqPX9niArbkQwhjA2DsDwG1IBWLmCcKQ 1Kag== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1684618263; x=1687210263; h=content-transfer-encoding:subject:from:to:content-language :user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id:x-gm-message-state:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=dvi1EKRlvfGk1PQqCwp+Hj7UaK94bmEZOshTj+u4Pqc=; b=Jpkm+NS1EcD6EAVh/4F2Eos7EI4jFKYa27BJXA491IZ8M4iMT+9s0Jsgggj63FtMOZ 4j9oYdc3IFE8LJKZ0+mzY9HcuylV10CwV7xxv6UrW8meTjsqZZvlm6MJC3tXrXNF/mny hccxtaDJhKh/FSSxwVGANZoHXvuGEhrMPTy519aawwBYZNBzVDXc9zwaGmgyRwSVGZoj 1klSA/QqlkMQDyZ1yvlVFEw24/Mbl1CBkWkerNLhWgYrsiAg5Ln3FWYtD2Wb179POhm0 D/BgwbH2tYxb31XaWwg7/+HiVhObz3ECU93sXkE43NEgw7amI2T/5QoDGFbdTQ5sNMXm ePbw== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDwyqoqqF8E70aXVG7X2CBNlU3MUcogHv/NklrFXwC7es0DPpJ9N w3vNeLhuOX3fURqeiavK+6QnC78IneE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ5BkkVViZ7murCa2D/zgN43UFxSpFPvuThT7jO4qVpPcyeuaYtvaI+tTRu5RAlPd7CZ4ktu5A== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:36ca:b0:95e:ce3b:a471 with SMTP id bj10-20020a17090736ca00b0095ece3ba471mr5857525ejc.55.1684618263166; Sat, 20 May 2023 14:31:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.0.9] (host27-89-206-54.limes.com.pl. [89.206.54.27]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id gw17-20020a170906f15100b0096f78953b77sm1196136ejb.147.2023.05.20.14.31.02 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 20 May 2023 14:31:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <86eeeb9a-4120-e858-f7be-05d4362d1985@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 20 May 2023 23:31:01 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.11.0 Content-Language: en-US To: "users@dpdk.org" From: Pawel Wodkowski Subject: ACL - on duplicate name the rte_acl_create returns existing object instead of failure Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: users-bounces@dpdk.org Hi, Following other parts of the DPDK library the rte_acl_create function should fail if ACL context with the same name already exists. Implicit ACL object sharing is not what is expected nor documented. Paweł