From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pg0-f65.google.com (mail-pg0-f65.google.com [74.125.83.65]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FE753B5 for ; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 11:22:12 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-pg0-f65.google.com with SMTP id g2so24503397pge.2 for ; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 03:22:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date :message-id:mime-version; bh=thZcWlRAl2GyVqhfCSNFQxFiQ/XTA6FXD8CoNApZDkg=; b=oy2OtEza6wR23c+88FVlD+eyZbA0kQL9mQtMkPAjGKz5UBFextkjFc6vPsDbUyKYG+ pqV5gFzpc8QJPbHx6EVl8ZsvQVGNoiM3+LyO/2Lpm7bR8CkkLrZ89RzuLuejKbVuIzpo nMKnxS899g/yB1IL3sU3xpGMXM2UofPgrQ+UWFspnc9kZcUgpEB+jS4ZISicciNjrtr/ 9yd6UhqLEIDJYs4DHejUKta/qgCsmEciToKtHTamjYYnzuDhtpJsHAvCgfBYSJPvuSp8 GP4HoNPMSVU0knAxLAWm+nhO0OEPe/ER9nnGAyWzwZuf3rBgRLIqD2zFbSPB5DsoynHC BqWg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject :in-reply-to:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=thZcWlRAl2GyVqhfCSNFQxFiQ/XTA6FXD8CoNApZDkg=; b=lXqAMmkFaDXm0aqY/mDaxGndiWJtGX86VDV6eCt6IvIawrYZrYplxwVEq60/MS1L0x JoMi7crcQDVa7YlTwyw7I7GIX9T0HfXICaeDCRFy75HOz2uyM1wqbTzWzDginb+5u07H zB2ID26CslPMaVT15q40KV2QdcNy4xkzqnX0+uKTAZCNWwglMXJhwWY0sTZTrSHEZ/Cz LLGRrkb1VyL8a5i7+Os4fdTcwIqCZZ72DZvxIYvltnKv4oruLjM9iGEsQSdCxYjkhhx9 1bpgR/pTIHoainyLElS/48zK8ERAFE36i2u2pdd1+RBcM6cV4g2jfvs8qOyaxZJANzlJ X5tw== X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H0yFqPKuYpT/EKXXKo0BAOykG7pNFhzfv5FXcGepbZiDIuCsWHlZVmzma3AuuBQCg== X-Received: by 10.99.5.133 with SMTP id 127mr28978690pgf.8.1490091731543; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 03:22:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([14.141.235.254]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r17sm9894268pfa.13.2017.03.21.03.22.09 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Tue, 21 Mar 2017 03:22:10 -0700 (PDT) References: <87d1dbgenm.fsf@parallelwireless.com> User-agent: mu4e 0.9.19; emacs 25.1.1 From: Anupam Kapoor To: Ankit Aggarwal Cc: Anupam Kapoor , Andrew Rybchenko , users@dpdk.org In-reply-to: Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 15:52:04 +0530 Message-ID: <87bmsvgcab.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] [dpdk-dev] Solarflare DPDK X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 10:22:12 -0000 ,----[ ankit-agarwal ] | "but, in terms of functionality" | | Can you elaborate on that? `---- sure, think l2 handling sepcifically, arp, neighbor table management etc. for l3 you need to manage routing etc. etc., from l4 onwards you need to worry about protocol specific handling, and protocol states which may or may not last application lifetimes etc. etc. but, i am guessing, openload's offering is already battle-tested, and provides sane sematics for stuff outlined above, both on virtualized, and bare-metal environments. or, as mentioned earlier, if you want to go with dpdk, then there are commercial offerings available there as well. -- kind regards anupam