From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp.ehu.eus (smtp.lg.ehu.es [158.227.0.66]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF2FD1B1B0 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2017 14:04:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from imsva2.lgp.ehu.es (imsva2.lgp.ehu.es [10.0.3.246]) by postfix.smtp2.imsva2 (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8AFCF7872 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2017 14:04:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from imsva2.lgp.ehu.es (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33EEC5A080 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2017 14:04:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from imsva2.lgp.ehu.es (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BEE15A053 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2017 14:03:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp.ehu.eus (unknown [10.0.100.76]) by imsva2.lgp.ehu.es (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2017 14:03:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from u017606.bi.ehu.es (u017606.bi.ehu.es [158.227.66.129]) by smtp2 (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DDFB2BDEB for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2017 14:03:06 +0200 (CEST) From: Eduardo Jacob To: users@dpdk.org Message-ID: <9317a86a-5e5a-5620-015e-1fbb43162b8d@ehu.eus> Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 14:03:06 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-GB X-Greylist: ACL 159 matched, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (smtp2); Tue, 26 Sep 2017 14:03:06 +0200 (CEST) X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.1.0.1631-8.1.0.1062-23352.005 X-TM-AS-Result: No--5.190-7.0-31-10 X-imss-scan-details: No--5.190-7.0-31-10 X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.1.0.1631-8.1.1062-23352.005 X-TMASE-Result: 10--5.190400-10.000000 X-TMASE-MatchedRID: HmC/Z5ul7SB2rQOOei+D+APZZctd3P4B+28MI88F5wTSYAzZ6KmqWgn9 ofQNoBQFlMvWplVyl072tPdox2qVb8dKywr687aZc+QhWKJM04OBA/jzcz3nARxUkJPe1WBqwjF TVk+Akfwo8MP1pOP862qgXgIgQPu54gVaspOn/PRIRA38P/dwbgtx7lnIMkAmseONmEIl6cL71l h8gFFqYaje1ZEL4eF82P9u9Ex5OMH4uTsX7EsL1p4CIKY/Hg3AtOt1ofVlaoLWRN8STJpl3PoLR 4+zsDTtw1tMVU7ONTyHTUrvsALTwysZYXB8KGeZkj8i/NvlVFMds3TaD5ElhQ== X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-12:0,22:0,33:0,34:0,39:0-0 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (postfix.smtp2.imsva2); Tue, 26 Sep 2017 14:04:12 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [dpdk-users] About XEON-D SRIOV and DPDK support X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2017 12:04:13 -0000 Hello Sorry for bandwidth... We have been playing with E5-2690 and DPDK on some experiments and we would like to use them in smaller form factor (XEON-D based) servers. I thought I would be able to get a clear view of the situation, but after googling some time I have not been able to get confident about the status of the XEON-D SRIOV and DPDK support in particular for the XEON D-1528. If somebody doesn't know, these SOCs have 6 cores, 2x10Gbps and 2x1Gbps and support up 128Gb. I have not been able to conclude if: a) the 10Gbps (x552?) interfaces support SRIOV and DPDK b) the 1Gbps (i350-AM2?) interfaces support SRIOV and DPDK On particular caveat is if all the same numbered SOCs are equal (in terms of SRIOV and DPDK support) or for integrated devices, like NICs, the motherboard manufacturer is able to make this available (BIOS support). This would mean that there is no clear answer knowing only the XEON-D part number and I should contact the manufacturer. This chip is "old" (2 years) and there are other newer. I wonder, if the SRIOV and DPDK support in this specific chip is unavailable or flaky, there are new SOCs that improve the situation. Best regards and sorry again if the question is not deemed appropriate. Eduardo