From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga07.intel.com (mga07.intel.com [134.134.136.100]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 340371B4AD for ; Fri, 8 Feb 2019 17:11:03 +0100 (CET) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga007.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.52]) by orsmga105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 Feb 2019 08:11:01 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.58,348,1544515200"; d="scan'208";a="120982743" Received: from fmsmsx103.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.124.201]) by fmsmga007.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 08 Feb 2019 08:11:01 -0800 Received: from fmsmsx117.amr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.3.160]) by FMSMSX103.amr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.2.115]) with mapi id 14.03.0415.000; Fri, 8 Feb 2019 08:11:01 -0800 From: "Wiles, Keith" To: "terry.montague.1980@btinternet.com" CC: "users@dpdk.org" Thread-Topic: [dpdk-users] i40e : Transmit rate limit control Thread-Index: AQHUtvtbl6xRq8wtlUmuLTHktti4Q6XWZHKAgABFdYA= Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2019 16:11:00 +0000 Message-ID: References: <1cda032.1135b.168942f5af2.Webtop.229@btinternet.com> <24a2d977.6234.168ccfcc2d7.Webtop.71@btinternet.com> In-Reply-To: <24a2d977.6234.168ccfcc2d7.Webtop.71@btinternet.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.255.228.113] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <2363905169BB444F91649325916483FA@intel.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] i40e : Transmit rate limit control X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2019 16:11:03 -0000 > On Feb 8, 2019, at 6:02 AM, terry.montague.1980@btinternet.com wrote: >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > Hi there. >=20 > Please can I ask this question again , as no-one replied. >=20 > Having transmit rate limiting at 25Gbe/40Gbe for the Intel i40e driver (7= 10 based cards) would be extremely useful for some applications. >=20 > Does anyone have any thoughts on achieving this or is it on the roadmap f= or i40e ? >=20 > Many thanks maybe include i40e maintainer in the email addresses then he may see the qu= estion. he email is in the maintainers file. >=20 > Terry >=20 >=20 > ------ Original Message ------ > From: "terry.montague.1980@btinternet.com" > To: users@dpdk.org > Sent: Monday, 28 Jan, 19 At 11:19 > Subject: [SPAM] [dpdk-users] i40e : Transmit rate limit control > Hi All,Is anyone working on some way of implementing transmit rate limit = control in the i40e driver ?I realise the X**710 Intel chip implements queu= e sets, where the tx queues can be assigned to a queue set and the set give= n an overall transmit rate - so its not as simple as the ixgbe PMD driver. = Is there a simplistic way of assigning just a single tx queue to a single = queue set and setting its transmit bandwidth through set_queue_rate_limit ?= Many thanksTerry Regards, Keith