From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pg0-f49.google.com (mail-pg0-f49.google.com [74.125.83.49]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B60F52C8 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2016 20:26:41 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-pg0-f49.google.com with SMTP id f188so147606127pgc.3 for ; Tue, 27 Dec 2016 11:26:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cloudsimple-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:message-id:date :to; bh=A5B8yAmwqL0yx4kMdDYvsZFuAMZSzIFj1A4o3p58bDk=; b=vTqMKxmWdjIU19Pb79n9ncw3RYCYxMykumELXsupkoINxrJiRTD6JwoJUocnJ3NAnC JpBJWlfvMVKPDyonTqMjU46+Kkcn4LQBaiirp0HVu3tQW5VcL17X8Ir5otVLZVTCtjgf jKDVlnTZlhV8of6k7kqLqmOrM6077dL6k7r5sz6Qe0jLmiIiGgrVXxorcagarhV4PTXZ uBZmgEcbLFRMEnJr7A3r87D9BR6yxh4C4g0QgaPIoXUe68S+IgS8mgVd/r+pO1uNWQIs cdwKT6Rybr7wq7Df3jlYZ77yAFAAaYI2QvM6r4/7gTAgnELlAjblPL2izbrUzCteHzQR nkqQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :subject:message-id:date:to; bh=A5B8yAmwqL0yx4kMdDYvsZFuAMZSzIFj1A4o3p58bDk=; b=pwmBm613QCyXHTuCZbfLWCwWZdsfBuEQ9rIzoj942azfKmUTV1XmrbpZH+M+bFnRUw uYH02IKi0R6Eo3Mi5XLlq1YfhchPI1EicG+AYKjm93+ZRjFoADN/gEh5x2TJ1ZCeCTC0 ljEM5XC31WgOmE0m3/MZ2WdVnTHq8G7TVqnjmNGBoEbPcOKW9HTqfeOmOwXtBcVqXzqF kvpRWQMGLaOuXu5WU0kRUAC6FgPB5uzbq+shgEiZUFUPQ2D1pivn+DMlRZmnkko6x8xD b26g1gwlsyj5teUVtd2cTwtzNiaJkI66y3UmsYESQnQA1K9zutVkVsQSC8H9eNFBg7vz SPzQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXLlH2aiaQzEl30M16bFabVsr/2Q8vwHfkNbgxBveLCY4gT5aqWQ89DfqLOPk5m/bqNCHMscQzpBmK3WffoBleuwDAnRElK7JXfz5IyirHsv9kc1+hamePRrPJ9ia9GpOcMJ6R6YwrEP4BhG3qlHzGHyeFmNJSnV9NiIYczQhfeH X-Received: by 10.84.196.164 with SMTP id l33mr69663307pld.150.1482866800675; Tue, 27 Dec 2016 11:26:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.104] ([116.202.125.21]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n24sm91497001pfb.0.2016.12.27.11.26.39 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 27 Dec 2016 11:26:40 -0800 (PST) From: Kumaraparameshwaran Rathnavel Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.1 \(3251\)) Message-Id: Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2016 00:56:36 +0530 To: users@dpdk.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3251) Subject: [dpdk-users] Network Drivers X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2016 19:26:42 -0000 Hi All, I find that DPDK provides the Multiqueue support depending on the number = of queues in the Hardware. So in case I need an application where I need = the order of the packet transmitted or received not to change using = multiple queues require the application to maintain the = synchronisations. So is the take right from the Mutiqueue point of view.=20= Thanking You, Param.=20=