From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <ashujain9727@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-it0-f51.google.com (mail-it0-f51.google.com
 [209.85.214.51]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC2569FE
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Fri,  8 Dec 2017 10:33:40 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-it0-f51.google.com with SMTP id t1so3597499ite.5
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Fri, 08 Dec 2017 01:33:40 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=b95IVVGPPqbkgx95FLaevrEycTRFOTBVcOtlwkx5dsE=;
 b=mcEuaNwroCWIMM6OW29Tt5PpjsocAuYdLbM1OQtYeRxEYzWWocboGc12NGr+0bOFg+
 ANL9m556ICNPStpBzcfTlkmx5wDxG5JVgDMmiAeefeIpcdl2UKefw3HTz6Y7W7up0i3W
 BKlLRqr82IA/dFS9M3rWNjaHUEWjO4mkc/FqxjGxB2sbkih27nhDuBZDL6eV88BRb9cq
 erijhR5sX+39HeoN4FYp2Nw0NbiGCatv4dKbN0Vw7/U2L5E8fllVr0AOI/lbwvRmTJ09
 TUoXMZmsbsZ5QthTtFBufxQBQ6Ok74R5MLg7PbPxJ3zFvKH5qBfDXrcfwWUZw5PnTGY7
 3TIw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to;
 bh=b95IVVGPPqbkgx95FLaevrEycTRFOTBVcOtlwkx5dsE=;
 b=J6KgZwKwwtLzcK/d5O6VyZ1vpBIivnTOEf/6rB4GHu0gt/rSn4knWGIra/8gU7MQX9
 vs8V/vGZJJSe/c7ivLhkGzzXFPgnLFMG5lrYIS7lGEhyNzw01LTcJDPN3vuX3IG9dGHf
 j689HIoEBO8fHwrsHS/LwyeROUHsof7SYIlAyGd/VbZ6qyKdjexeC8h+uQM+yeZjchpS
 w6/XeZVr3jvtdSUaqpp3MMcEykoq2vtWRY82u8nwvWvWJo6enRehdaBOAPMcUUoRMztr
 Hc2AWVySElsXUOokN3F31ukaAUW0IFUKyBnfNb0jI0OvmTdzMndO4TXfbP8Vc+Afp4oh
 NQnA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mIAaAI89wO4SjJYS8BtXgjzoekOt9F2HRGRz2Kx3aA7UidRANbs
 Qa5IA4R0YvMHpDoAMjYb3NnaBGj3TGeOu7GnIUuRQw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMbjBe75Lcv99dJ3Q9JXqeAzNfpkbrDUr4dgd2HkIMO0YNNR2PNXvPpSA4Ut8Z0ePF5KdwPUGVxMvAfDFRSgLdo=
X-Received: by 10.107.180.18 with SMTP id d18mr1887269iof.52.1512725619756;
 Fri, 08 Dec 2017 01:33:39 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.2.72.134 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Dec 2017 01:33:39 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CA+9-LvuxFJ4i4mVyYityC_8WSVZPLHYpSixEqKTxfzGR2xUDKw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+9-LvuxFJ4i4mVyYityC_8WSVZPLHYpSixEqKTxfzGR2xUDKw@mail.gmail.com>
From: abhishek jain <ashujain9727@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2017 15:03:39 +0530
Message-ID: <CA+9-LvsqoTMQ_EBJ_2Qegb1ebp5e3REGM5rN4VFiYFiwig5oTA@mail.gmail.com>
To: users@dpdk.org, "Mooney, Sean K" <sean.k.mooney@intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] Poor OVS-DPDK performance
X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK usage discussions <users.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/users/>
List-Post: <mailto:users@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2017 09:33:41 -0000

Hi Team

Below is my OVS configuration..

root@node-3:~# ovs-vsctl get Open_vSwitch . other_config
{dpdk-init="true", dpdk-lcore-mask="7fe", dpdk-socket-mem="1024",
pmd-cpu-mask="1800"}
root@node-3:~#

root@node-3:~#
root@node-3:~# cat /proc/cmdline
BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-3.13.0-137-generic root=/dev/mapper/os-root ro
console=tty0 net.ifnames=0 biosdevname=0 rootdelay=90 nomodeset
root=UUID=2949f531-bedc-47a0-a2f2-6ebf8e1d1edb iommu=pt intel_iommu=on
isolcpus=11,12,13,14,15,16

root@node-3:~#
root@node-3:~# ovs-appctl dpif-netdev/pmd-stats-show
main thread:
        emc hits:2
        megaflow hits:0
        miss:2
        lost:0
        polling cycles:99607459 (98.80%)
        processing cycles:1207437 (1.20%)
        avg cycles per packet: 25203724.00 (100814896/4)
        avg processing cycles per packet: 301859.25 (1207437/4)
pmd thread numa_id 0 core_id 11:
        emc hits:0
        megaflow hits:0
        miss:0
        lost:0
        polling cycles:272926895316 (100.00%)
        processing cycles:0 (0.00%)
pmd thread numa_id 0 core_id 12:
        emc hits:0
        megaflow hits:0
        miss:0
        lost:0
        polling cycles:240339950037 (100.00%)
        processing cycles:0 (0.00%)
root@node-3:~#

root@node-3:~#
root@node-3:~# grep -r Huge /proc/meminfo
AnonHugePages:     59392 kB
HugePages_Total:    5126
HugePages_Free:     4870
HugePages_Rsvd:        0
HugePages_Surp:        0
Hugepagesize:       2048 kB
root@node-3:~#

I'm using OVS version 2.4.1

Regards
Abhishek Jain

On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 11:18 AM, abhishek jain <ashujain9727@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi Team
>
>
> Currently I have OVS-DPDK setup configured on Ubuntu 14.04.5 LTS. I'm also
> having one vnf with vhost interfaces mapped to OVS bridge br-int.
> However when I'm performing throughput with the same vnf,I'm getting very
> less throughput.
>
> Please provide me some pointers to boost the performance of vnf with
> OVS-DPDK configuration.
>
> Regards
> Abhishek Jain
>