From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <ashujain9727@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-it0-f42.google.com (mail-it0-f42.google.com
 [209.85.214.42]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42374237
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Fri,  8 Dec 2017 06:48:59 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-it0-f42.google.com with SMTP id o130so3599807itg.0
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Thu, 07 Dec 2017 21:48:59 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
 h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=9PHsO5lk6Lhld2sxKG3I7Du+B2go0x4gz3a9IUDmwNA=;
 b=hGje4O04CTW/CpeZ99BMNraAIokrwvRI0mnjCy7ggNLeq46qTERgFCtGsDFzBP6vzY
 wBQo9qjpvmaeEThZ8UDSOgNvCIcrxHkxngL1qqnJzSOQgJum8Rx3MAfagiqACbuh2Xv3
 A55zZ27xH4p3Cb6R3BqQsR+wNeEISJDb1dsbvDNHDGVgN1c3wT6vOCMHdbqVVwbB3R6w
 H5nH56MXeT5obwPTpHps9fDwDoz4UQqJvHgWs7VMo9MRNBbyKnGx7FnHrYd7HdgfAAfP
 PhVc4zoxvdP9t+FqaPnnEo7mzrPz2+L9ZojW3DeBXi6hByrmNnLb5oHlANsy7dw2hHle
 b/Cg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=9PHsO5lk6Lhld2sxKG3I7Du+B2go0x4gz3a9IUDmwNA=;
 b=JMApz3NhSKfizQo5tSpHtX82lraD3G29nZYOkuXB3fLfj+hwC3FrtLfZjweyIehh9N
 fxRGpgghQ6FYfwYz5ozMxgk06Y7W9J2QYipchGs94aD8/2krAQBPwYQ8xM1aT2xkgDWL
 8oCJVmhVoK5ZyfYOn970Rjdl8gGtWMjL8tTc5iw6mDJHEuZC4f8KlONVnfiWqh/aXqG6
 onZVF61Q8EovK2P+B1xZRVu0p5NKC3soX5xe4bz8/fdp6naUyy7Z1MZL7Gb2+xV6qcjt
 aecXqMsg9V3I2IMPBu3RUb0McUMghjUn/Mn+ciZ2vbEjSlNs59Ivkj+vCIjn3BdOnfev
 jpqw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX4aHL4PWcHLMTfG7HOCDSb8Oj61IrqA2Wv8vqryXvSU8XS0gFs6
 zNtcOMvH5iKIkR+0f8UWJRzu4wHI3HF9OwGsruw0WA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMZ/rwoirhUrTm342nZow69PQissOXjFw+WXEQoroqAOKsdk0FndfzKRUAQNUwVtpXR3sHYkKdDBC5ws12Wc9Kw=
X-Received: by 10.107.85.5 with SMTP id j5mr40154060iob.296.1512712138221;
 Thu, 07 Dec 2017 21:48:58 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.2.72.134 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Dec 2017 21:48:57 -0800 (PST)
From: abhishek jain <ashujain9727@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2017 11:18:57 +0530
Message-ID: <CA+9-LvuxFJ4i4mVyYityC_8WSVZPLHYpSixEqKTxfzGR2xUDKw@mail.gmail.com>
To: users@dpdk.org, "Mooney, Sean K" <sean.k.mooney@intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: [dpdk-users] Poor OVS-DPDK performance
X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK usage discussions <users.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/users/>
List-Post: <mailto:users@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2017 05:48:59 -0000

Hi Team


Currently I have OVS-DPDK setup configured on Ubuntu 14.04.5 LTS. I'm also
having one vnf with vhost interfaces mapped to OVS bridge br-int.
However when I'm performing throughput with the same vnf,I'm getting very
less throughput.

Please provide me some pointers to boost the performance of vnf with
OVS-DPDK configuration.

Regards
Abhishek Jain