DPDK usage discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cliff Burdick <shaklee3@gmail.com>
To: Arvind Narayanan <webguru2688@gmail.com>
Cc: users <users@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] rte_flow / hw-offloading is degrading performance when testing @ 100G
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2019 18:23:01 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+Gp1nbgf4ocSXUf7ag7_V=2p2XLfV0kfMmhEKn5-wexZtzSgw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHJJQSXFNwB0zEhi4A82m+vrVAu5j=B=Zh7kCS7AKnP-W9kLrg@mail.gmail.com>

What size packets are you using? I've only steered to 2 rx queues by IP dst
match, and was able to hit 100Gbps. That's with a 4KB jumboframe.

On Thu, Feb 28, 2019, 17:42 Arvind Narayanan <webguru2688@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I am using DPDK 18.11 on Ubuntu 18.04, with Mellanox Connect X-5 100G
> EN (MLNX_OFED_LINUX-4.5-1.0.1.0-ubuntu18.04-x86_64).
> Packet generator: t-rex 2.49 running on another machine.
>
> I am able to achieve 100G line rate with l3fwd application (fr sz 64B)
> using the parameters suggested in their performance report.
> (
> https://fast.dpdk.org/doc/perf/DPDK_18_11_Mellanox_NIC_performance_report.pdf
> )
>
> However, as soon as I install rte_flow rules to steer packets to
> different queues and/or use rte_flow's mark action, the throughput
> reduces to ~41G. I also modified DPDK's flow_filtering example
> application, and am getting the same reduced throughput of around 41G
> out of 100G. But without rte_flow, it goes to 100G.
>
> I didn't change any OS/Kernel parameters to test l3fwd or the
> application that uses rte_flow. I also ensure the application is
> numa-aware and use 20 cores to handle 100G traffic.
>
> Upon further investigation (using Mellanox NIC counters), the drop in
> throughput is due to mbuf allocation errors.
>
> Is such performance degradation normal when performing hw-acceleration
> using rte_flow?
> Has anyone tested throughput performance using rte_flow @ 100G?
>
> Its surprising to see hardware offloading is degrading the
> performance, unless I am doing something wrong.
>
> Thanks,
> Arvind
>

  reply	other threads:[~2019-03-01  2:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-01  1:42 Arvind Narayanan
2019-03-01  2:23 ` Cliff Burdick [this message]
2019-03-01  2:57   ` Arvind Narayanan
2019-03-01  3:07     ` Cliff Burdick

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CA+Gp1nbgf4ocSXUf7ag7_V=2p2XLfV0kfMmhEKn5-wexZtzSgw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=shaklee3@gmail.com \
    --cc=users@dpdk.org \
    --cc=webguru2688@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).