From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-lf1-f46.google.com (mail-lf1-f46.google.com [209.85.167.46]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36B3B2B83 for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2018 08:48:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-lf1-f46.google.com with SMTP id j8-v6so10457897lfb.4 for ; Sun, 12 Aug 2018 23:48:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=dkqt/YWh7/2uT98NDc/lf2wvr7iGQwIwSw6nsMluHpY=; b=aSjy76MiELMPtnt6kzixHAYSAtwU0DB1PXQBLWXafmGN4PWrTFsmpytdjgTqJDbvpx EDTW3AXwwG6q44dm27o8LQC/cfXGjCn7am8A1Mshqhl/HuFs6kMbpgIpgkm5T2KyeKeR xtG9pwSP2myhpu/UYonr63BvZBH6YHgE2O9AcBt9FnD67/yWnepTzDDh+JYrlX1dU5Nz n8Cnuv5N5913jbQbl4Lx17fkEFDrOaILQTrcEEEz6hSEw8Qdl/ix6QAjaV2DKjhn25AL DCjSNRaGuAec3uQBTw3tvUqewst6GhynkpoyE+wWgjaYeYPFILSd/6xbbJkEmP8j9GMf 90Hg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=dkqt/YWh7/2uT98NDc/lf2wvr7iGQwIwSw6nsMluHpY=; b=hrC83fyLYW1GoRNuadjcSN8ZmdhphMau830dp8ZOIaKWCmtrZbj66FjTs2B/4GKyRL zwgsG0locOZnIRRy9mQz8uHEq2NeKxU6astAMVApr2lQmcx/4tQ/p4wj3mtj1zdwQBcd zTZPGZuFO2snBvnYF5Mvhhjc7WJWTwBt0eFUj01Q7m/ieNIXedmwYNYtgIbgUmo+rgCZ vAH8miVPCZnsoX+kDayJpGADK6gOA9c8mV7Qu/dkxtwN9ELU4hWBtgk5ma9LKHfsN2fc 2k51Q8ImVu3Or+yfz3o/s39cT/nIxceh8fkJVB78lmipfxmzxHKvP9yk891roknuUlPb GDXQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlEvyQEEjX0KE3EJ6rIdri8vmVvYoIKbcvW84P3AmyZlKv/waeVK XBrEAQM0300chP+QauL4VnNpBSmiA5nLmRxmaEk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA+uWPymB/Ebhxohk8qzwRr2R5oP/H5yO2m89oOBv2Sa9FPCnp9EzgOsiMJ/FQewiXz2iDkcLQPXIK4tZsTS096VSKc= X-Received: by 2002:a19:5309:: with SMTP id h9-v6mr9901625lfb.86.1534142935740; Sun, 12 Aug 2018 23:48:55 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Dmitry B Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2018 09:48:43 +0300 Message-ID: To: maverickjin88@gmail.com Cc: users@dpdk.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] stalled after receiving 8000 rte_mbuf (4096 byte) X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2018 06:48:56 -0000 Hi, Is there a chance you don't free mbufs (*rte_pktmbuf_free()*)? Thanks Dima On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 6:35 AM Sungho Hong wrote: > Hello > > I am developing a project with DPDK but have encountered a silly issue, > that is not obvious to me. > > I am sending and receiving 4kb rte_mbuf between remote and local node, > that alone works fine, > however when I combine the implemenation with 3rd party library, the DPDK > stops receiving the data after approximatelyr receiving 8000 packets. > > I have debugged all the possible program side and to my astonishement. > there is no error found and all the packets that are within 8000 are > received correctly. > > I have no idea the approach to find out the problem of this situation. but > the situation that I have mentioned can be replicated. It always stops at > approximately 8000 packets received. > and there are absolutely no bugs found in dpdk (user interface). The only > problem is the rte_rx_queue stops returning the packets after 8000 packets. > > Would there be a good approach to identify the problem of this case? > -- -----