From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <amit.sh1094@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-qk0-f177.google.com (mail-qk0-f177.google.com
 [209.85.220.177]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0293938E
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Thu,  8 Sep 2016 12:38:32 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-qk0-f177.google.com with SMTP id w204so39314360qka.0
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Thu, 08 Sep 2016 03:38:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=WDir3CoZ9AaaLWqff5J4SRMnvyZVaRcCOPsdZB3Ehq8=;
 b=pRE9OtYulQFd1xoG/uOI7R8DiuMMgxYcLApT7kYGlfhyD7rYITF4ACvHACuZH157y/
 BkoakTtMB7GVHHHBGYsvK0cNMvfd5ECPaXj5dQTCWW4thQShmNq7MDfAD5OLt+bUqiTi
 kQ7Dj2e9kiU8td6ENNyIAUXmax3ZSYLF0hniuA7ObWNFQl99fGHCri91QXTRk+2N9q1z
 wzb5bUuyaGKBf9KtW9DrRXB5yyiBGZJcsR7pFVZFM+cXvLjuMerYLSSrHLZAyx3qVoGV
 HUW5Hc8lliJUBsSeZR5M21AIzB/zxrRHjzE1rHPUpPAESKJGhGck7vbySzYNW2FUvkUu
 IBvw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=WDir3CoZ9AaaLWqff5J4SRMnvyZVaRcCOPsdZB3Ehq8=;
 b=ZI60pkdaCW/7I6YRA983t24NPUyjcmzeFG1IkWm92qWyElF9ZIe7AMSclxIic0gm9x
 7VaivyleCzQ6aCBFB9IcVobF4ciAJrq7bSj7TGlQ1irUxgJRrekGGLxameQXHFV3NNvk
 /ypMYAt1RpleLmmTMKfbV/pRlp4whK1ELIvUs4eIZEpJsoG2ZlPYNvVhCwDirYEMCUZ4
 zTXLh0PNn02hjxBb/a2okhjLOuOpzsXhZnYOo+elICtH8a9U5WUanSYfHRHflk4obX+w
 z9179n/RWVOq7/ntLWRCN3b44wDVPmdvS0izziBSRL/1cusPEn+TZYn93c8lLlDpluHS
 FtRQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwN1p4w0WZinLOvvJfYLzGy6GkE4sa1u4KfhpZjRUI5TjtsdsAP/BXtncasH/2SllhTSS1OGbpk1Tp+wdw==
X-Received: by 10.55.88.199 with SMTP id m190mr56854597qkb.78.1473331111965;
 Thu, 08 Sep 2016 03:38:31 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.55.6.5 with HTTP; Thu, 8 Sep 2016 03:38:31 -0700 (PDT)
From: Amit Sharma <amit.sh1094@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 16:08:31 +0530
Message-ID: <CA+VcHB+=LQntAcujWJkURGu3nqgJL8DuzhaLP6HfmYNxx8Kt+g@mail.gmail.com>
To: users@dpdk.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: [dpdk-users] Query Regarding KNI
X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: usage discussions <users.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/users/>
List-Post: <mailto:users@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2016 10:38:32 -0000

Hi,

I am working on DPDK KNI example and want to use only 2 cores for 2 DPDK
ports.

Right now in my setup, i have created 2 KNI DPDK ports and for this setup i
am using 4 different cores. I want to explore the option that i can use 1
rx and 1 tx core for both the ports.

Is it possible to do the same using KNI example? If yes, Any input will be
very helpful.

Thanks
Amit Sharma