From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <v.maffione@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-qt1-f172.google.com (mail-qt1-f172.google.com
 [209.85.160.172]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B83CE4F91
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Sun, 28 Oct 2018 09:07:13 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-qt1-f172.google.com with SMTP id k12so41447qtf.7
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Sun, 28 Oct 2018 01:07:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
 h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to
 :cc; bh=8nC5x0uoONa2IRjdg/tSNrKIupSVTiI5TJjHXg+L0Ig=;
 b=mBQbws8QNnk/esjTY/AnnCUeIGN36RqA1R/I/+mT+mvxevnV2vQyQF3GNK26kSWPuq
 /lwtjjCpjVNN/HXLSTR9SfRaKtS5Y9IS1xtHtFSAlhUMh1yBMqGVAPBGd4trP3b75DB6
 Fj/dVLs3is+ds3VlDxHNWjhe45c9HW2TzzTc8eP0T2JF41UQdtIBp5rYOntumVs4sTz9
 k31cyBlIY/7W+i3eu84Pc4leU1IsSI7z3PL4k8VKZyeLODA8LidYI3aC727U9IdHYzce
 ULf/+bLygOAf/XDvd2lqQnq9uME/SYYUKwy0VVBRZ7Js9S9eny/EPIwyk5ToeyNJCKbY
 vMeg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to:cc;
 bh=8nC5x0uoONa2IRjdg/tSNrKIupSVTiI5TJjHXg+L0Ig=;
 b=CiTsWKwAOUAE3BeK7DlF0TDkoHEQGCeXTkdK8sJ6rWxyp2ro3qQl6QswrtfvQZdeKI
 DqG2QnNCVCHM9wAshzbJLo+NmFHgvT3UkoEqBjzEMW1p3dBz7MhB2Hm9RpPB0Vv7KDt2
 AQLvN7iFwUOTy8Al+cmBaAQXJ+xu0KPZdfH5ztI+V9Pc71FYK13ig2aoGcnknUOfvGfk
 IdWklif0thRU48m9H5WKZ84KbzzPHqkcTkK/cyYtsu4oGBeAlm8ndZzBFNjLNCur68uT
 HM4kPGX4EQ4WxPh+5ImzTHsKUcPZFiQgf6Zy7hIn18h1drSzZxOkJAllPZRP4jP7hycW
 KvgA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gLqrhWWsSiEVm+9dpqYHS1pp89OgG0mxwGL5o3vNVXlZ5qklPrC
 pcp90g9laAwpbQT7FAJOmc/XrAeYE5nx33WABrs=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5erby4uSSbVcACTZuNw9TMcc8p1eszzwlj6r8anFNe+LVeHlBQGBqLsFjMMG6RXtWq6QCMLRhzcY+i43790u94=
X-Received: by 2002:aed:34c5:: with SMTP id
 x63-v6mr9283990qtd.156.1540714033067; 
 Sun, 28 Oct 2018 01:07:13 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAK8vx=hQ7YbbVhtXa-FveT7QXmmbJMYEkzzsSENDK0HSa9HiDQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+_eA9i9rABQbzdvYyg3fQNE97qUFfRUj_gbEu+VDVt0cYvevw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAK8vx=g6TWx4yKz=eLRvPhTOst4aCdWT1eRcFv=AUzfp_8ovFQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAK8vx=g6TWx4yKz=eLRvPhTOst4aCdWT1eRcFv=AUzfp_8ovFQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Vincenzo Maffione <v.maffione@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2018 09:07:02 +0100
Message-ID: <CA+_eA9hxMOzQqXjnJ5F+y=+8fFrA_vjNt7L8VvHNVO5RzcqJtw@mail.gmail.com>
To: maverickjin88@gmail.com
Cc: users@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 05:58:14 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] Why DPDK latency is high when sending message in
	interval?
X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK usage discussions <users.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/users/>
List-Post: <mailto:users@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2018 08:07:14 -0000

If you don't care about CPU utilization, busy-wait is the way to go.
Otherwise you can try to usleep() for something like 60-70 us (to lower the
CPU utilization), and then busy-wait for the rest of the interval (so that
you still have maximum precision).

You may want to have a look at this
https://academic.oup.com/comjnl/article/61/6/808/4259797 , specially
sections 4.3 and 4.1.

Cheers,
  Vincenzo

Il giorno dom 28 ott 2018 alle ore 09:01 Sungho Hong <
maverickjin88@gmail.com> ha scritto:

> Thank you very much for the reply.
> But in that case, should I busy wait, to create the delay?
>
>
>

-- 
Vincenzo