From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C47CA04EF for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2020 04:34:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DFF11BF54; Wed, 3 Jun 2020 04:34:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-lj1-f169.google.com (mail-lj1-f169.google.com [209.85.208.169]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C59A1BF31 for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2020 04:34:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-lj1-f169.google.com with SMTP id c11so784197ljn.2 for ; Tue, 02 Jun 2020 19:34:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=MRUoRHydKMesnlFTx/7bZH8/u5Xmx1hsPoGMeLsAz6w=; b=NfyRqEmZhQ9Q3dhJ3mWPySDjH1dzV9wkVJTx6xTd/XS+X5HKCRKTnm+xDB+hAiW40K wNue+FpotVfPYgkvZ49f02RoGDkljQNM9pxMv1a8emlv1sJ0gOebeAaramRyH5vaxFQP NATIPlNAsOYOmVlAG80NCtdXMa+YOg2ju7sUkOxk343FwAGXRLA7tVjZ6pA+idLpQbj4 39vG9Ly4zzx6Q7KyR0DcxaqpsHbST9Ojz9BDEGSXUd0TwQmG7wvFpaq7r7Agu0KUj/Yt 46ikcGx9YT7JFOk3ZGCy19oIBKZlqr5T2P0Yh/8uVJm+WVB7efO6NoE587z2eeRu6yv3 SxHQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=MRUoRHydKMesnlFTx/7bZH8/u5Xmx1hsPoGMeLsAz6w=; b=rnIBC1DDdALmjW77j5PDCH3vHDyyqi921FNe0Y4Bz4fNQTeUGVX71yGco5oZPYWi7e ASlzrXm/PY1zx8I9K9iv/o8luhu2XXBX2QllxX0Gme9koX42JHs0/IDeJYI2ii+vM1cV Ihbm38hTF3EklRUMAel+MGmku9y33GU8S/owKqrUkZoz8t6Fov5lZSeBe44GhTwkdZ1K 6YOqt6w47OKkR9CjDmMgy7rKiwWOpV31suxqh2Tngp7Jgl+RnTZ45oPWaUEekp3u4CWj Vjk4bRdo+DL11QsdxM6nyoQ3KHxwaZRBZXloID2zIKMtCRkTbZbAlt071gq+Au7AEQUR N55A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531BzHzLweLE9oewbKpGSk/OwTHK/HTbJ3le2GcRWEKfvtnlSvx3 tzkHXCitgmUZdnykKtCyaboPuyWliiAOXWNkYqKHI0Om X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwNEL0tl7SzfQzOTJ8l0PtQqulJoxeYWEOEVu8EjqYjfEJdz5GNe3zDh6TtZVd/M6gG/Z/OhhPTFwkMk984JeI= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:8e8d:: with SMTP id z13mr833794ljk.461.1591151681753; Tue, 02 Jun 2020 19:34:41 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200602192145.49255119@hermes.lan> In-Reply-To: <20200602192145.49255119@hermes.lan> From: Ding Ma Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2020 19:34:30 -0700 Message-ID: To: Stephen Hemminger Cc: users@dpdk.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] Need help: Generate core list error. rte_eal port num [0] is not match the pciidlist [4] X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: users-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "users" Really appreciate your help. Two follow-ups: - it actually works on 48 cores server and do you know why? (The problem server is 96 cores) - which part in config I need to change? (Sorry I am a noob) . Also, I am using pre-built RPM to install dpdk, do I have to rebuild the RPM on 96 cores server in order to run it on the 96 cores server? On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 7:21 PM Stephen Hemminger wrote: > On Tue, 2 Jun 2020 18:04:57 -0700 > Ding Ma wrote: > > > Hope it's the right way to ask DPDK questions. I am new to DPDK world and > > got an error while setting up dpdk on my server. any idea about where I > > should look at? > > > > > > 1. Error: rte_eal port num [0] is not match the pciidlist [4] > > 2. EAL: Error - exiting with code: 1 > > 3. Cause: Generate core list error > > > > > > Full paste: > > ttps://pastebin.com/zea7514Y > > Your DPDK is built for only 32 CPU's and you have a machine with 128. > Change your config and move on to the next issue. > > * There are patches in review to avoid this in future versions of DPDK. >