From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAB2FA057B for ; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 14:51:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D3471BE91; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 14:51:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-lj1-f182.google.com (mail-lj1-f182.google.com [209.85.208.182]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D54F7FFA; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 14:50:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-lj1-f182.google.com with SMTP id r24so3102927ljd.4; Thu, 02 Apr 2020 05:50:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=NYDAE4LslCP0ip77RqXn9frju4ss5toJWBTmU+nsDAc=; b=ZRU8+K/hfiISws9EmIVrYwLHLZnjzxnDxPdquhQQXqTXm95+CtU+thjABuLqXQrkkG 7v4d+i8YFgSHp3EzpZox4dHMFT200B4nE/SAIMfuIiTTepGh4QLECYoL0pY7Z8ZbIYc+ 8YULAfxPNZl5L/Xnjka6kNE5LyztDoxWYgA0sGF2+z2us2zmBGkhsPynTFzllLzErqmg X4G+tNDUvaoIO3W4n5zbIEi9AiYeo7LktxjGyVCXQXJ2axw8mQhk7/gjxOzIqGlfxS5h AOWc1rZmaTk1PHMWgUU1CpirNaAvIJ3VlgsZQO+/7LwUjTeVcoKGFLGsR1k5NEsoZ5vz wDfQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=NYDAE4LslCP0ip77RqXn9frju4ss5toJWBTmU+nsDAc=; b=UEAE+L9a1VbrYw0BgD+1sw3UzvgSttBDNwAVBJiCQiPZYTkHB4T504/cOVzt9Xsbs8 v1jTrIBF2lw4RpweeB9Rj3Q0OPVgj9Cu1eeeqIArfQmILsdUex3cHJTy7QGFocDBoqRl uOboAA6RpzkMf7T1f3b3myIV1crVKfWNo7/40ulvDMzv997omj9TaWvC4iibr091h7ZC CAnEYggkoG+1+/x8uZa+EQXEHHlD4XPW8e8sIOU1M0b7kA96pRZTxCcowxcSVwYVZVIi B3n/95GdrnrSvGa292RLXdZCzonx0Xt7yBSuwXf1zBmy3ECjok4wvnoFMVwSk9NxAwlI dUKA== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuZJC5mtOr2TBKiBxMDsTqUhOmfw14R5g4OBkatU2rd3bpQSa51C 9JVl6l6+ztxhEEPz2XDgUwD9L3CIXcXz4AUqQUTGjQ7lArw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypIozJ11pI1XWrngctlDNbioixCNLXBGe5Nb5tqA7eVyG3U/jUatTe9njpbCrQHPQ+QvDEiWQ3GMUkLqWj5n3aQ= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:96c4:: with SMTP id d4mr2017523ljj.19.1585831858334; Thu, 02 Apr 2020 05:50:58 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Venumadhav Josyula Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2020 18:21:50 +0530 Message-ID: To: users , dev@dpdk.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: [dpdk-users] Using rte_lpm as standalone library w/o mempools or dpdk infra X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: users-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "users" Hi All, Idea is following - create lpm in one process where only rte_lpm and bare minimum is acessible. Addition into this table will also happen in this process context. - Now in the packet processing context based ip of packet the lookup will happen in the lpm created. Is above possible. Please task / Process in which lpm created or lpm entries added, does not do anything with respect to rte_eal. Any pointers, will really be appreciated. Cheers, Venu