From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <users-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CC30A051C
	for <public@inbox.dpdk.org>; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 15:10:00 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3289A2BF1;
	Tue, 11 Feb 2020 15:09:55 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mail-qv1-f41.google.com (mail-qv1-f41.google.com
 [209.85.219.41]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 414AC2B9C
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 15:09:54 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-qv1-f41.google.com with SMTP id m5so5023675qvv.4
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 06:09:54 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=csie-io.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
 h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=kuevo0Z9OHty2HKz4/czuh+p5ttE60lV+smdpBh8pdA=;
 b=G5T8b1mrXydQIutkShJoEc62RafhJcXZmMu+ocIk5a7VhntpNPXp6Tk1b7QlCwgTrY
 nENO6v9/pGz6djYoNcN87bdKCZnzquhr3A7SGVHymKe+qUGNfXdpJH0o4bUXl8t2P43S
 WEBoWSKiu68IrhlMIQW+x3wuyy79ryzfzF3fw78K1SJfenTn41qnwtyN+BgkSH8u2VC3
 3WrBc/6zial2EpCqOraEvu0bDHUBS0hK9BoNRsbTABFyJPPKZYs+bA0bcC8jLmvcqHci
 Rg0fJVlI+P8rGervXvlca9MJB5EpcRGldd5CnC/iTlc2q/WV2atsAlOGNKVa5F51sS19
 wOmQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=kuevo0Z9OHty2HKz4/czuh+p5ttE60lV+smdpBh8pdA=;
 b=FnVYnJ5GtWJvsteHUz+zXtu5dBSv0vdfnvf800/uThW7U0hx0YP8YmE8FR/NS3+4Kq
 NVkJrzPX+I6Rib1TGTY+KbKOxNfjwAHRS/jEUHxOGCd/rxMianSgr5/XpnrJoDbz92ku
 yRz/KmVXPvhlLKxvYd9ndOoBtBJozGPqgKN2TiznrRd8h6s9VPUVn4g4b0aBEukEGGEo
 FHP+Pv5FyrMqRUf/S6Ih5Xh9FS+8F5LFe2lCv4g3NPJI3l5/5Cbn7iKT5IgRgVQ5x4Bh
 A6kWCtUBPHicnCIg2yZTmYrD5SgCMtn7mURJUWt/VhS2XJ1tic0Y1H4rP+KX53F2nW/A
 6ECQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWoFqRLkHw+yBcQtfMpyTpbMDhcZGOZKx/QbVTqUzI8lLxpS9rk
 w0uTvlN6/FuRu4LwZXRMZKSVZgKA5TYuzsdlakiW5z9adCQ=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzQs8OouWr/GP9LaFDLnpH8jb4hFo/vV7Vvvf3TRdXbVdW4pdPpBJ/uV7shBzCnorlN4/Yz09+UP0BSNaLBEK8=
X-Received: by 2002:a0c:a281:: with SMTP id g1mr3078068qva.168.1581430193324; 
 Tue, 11 Feb 2020 06:09:53 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: =?UTF-8?B?5by15pWs5piK?= <frank@csie.io>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 22:09:42 +0800
Message-ID: <CA+vFTf9z6WKZ0pip2GEZQXRKEhWVQHkfgz8Zep=EPjAL7=7AMw@mail.gmail.com>
To: users@dpdk.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: [dpdk-users] Segmentation fault in eth_igb_xmit_pkts() with TX
	offloading disabled
X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK usage discussions <users.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/users/>
List-Post: <mailto:users@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: users-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "users" <users-bounces@dpdk.org>

Hi list,

I'm trying to send packets with DPDK 17.11. I tested my application with a
XL710 nic and everything worked smoothly. However, when testing with i210,
something weird happened.

For some performance reasons, I have disabled the TX offloading in my
application by setting txqconf.txq_flags to ETH_TXQ_FLAGS_NOOFFLOADS and
setting only PKT_TX_IPV4 to the ol_flags of mbuf. When
calling rte_eth_tx_burst(),  I always end up getting a segmentation fault
signal in eth_igb_xmit_pkts(). Interestingly, when I re-enabled the TX
offloading, everything works. Does anyone know what went wrong?

Thanks!

BR,

Frank