From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BE12A04F3 for ; Tue, 7 Jan 2020 18:37:47 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9242A1D9FD; Tue, 7 Jan 2020 18:37:43 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-qk1-f172.google.com (mail-qk1-f172.google.com [209.85.222.172]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E63971D5D6 for ; Mon, 6 Jan 2020 08:29:08 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-qk1-f172.google.com with SMTP id d71so30843268qkc.0 for ; Sun, 05 Jan 2020 23:29:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=JAeOgFrhTKS7C+nDHq6ZvEBuGjmb6o67it7kTO8uWuA=; b=rCaDIjaekQISAsgBFNQF1WKp/r+YgnwEm5FzpTdStHW7JEgJFUMadoasW+kJvG9Xy8 JySQdpzs+WjDMBvM6AujT2tQ5U9fniMpDTKSRcQuEtxfnmXLS5c4a7UfPriVzPOYbL9D a9hoIf8CM6e7u6BtKLhkM3uVj5c3FG2JmpH3R94ZqyAPhWow2YhWWRaNc8aPtVUTBwui zQLw56nJGpmNxo4q1UtSnjiG0+3wwrRtlL26PZ+eDTE8Q3NsULExba7tSP2lJ9JqR1TO twRmnYX4qxwPSN7xa9L0yfyrybtuW+hBsHUGJmtmmCKBHKP6OD06u1Z2Ll62ozVt4qJm L45g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=JAeOgFrhTKS7C+nDHq6ZvEBuGjmb6o67it7kTO8uWuA=; b=sxrX1cDZAHoXyqCVihl8VtyTaMmkjfs2KQrsc3etvezXuFn9W8GrXNAJbD5yYXbKry GhGJudOXM/5myPVr5bx13UPKIt2aZ/8riRZxIwFVGmFT2ZcnWQARp/78EhR74W5JT1bR Be1kmPQvjuZyM3lkgS3Lqt2Fzrzv3xPw8hpnsKFATzjc2Bagig2YGQy10Aftuar9yBKW PA5uxDq6P8Qxpcf5m/vXz4E0wj5e9bWH9Xnd6L1bkXuZ/kJuOh48ohSpMoVMyC7LOxds vyIuYceKZTx1SpNs40r+MF0rOFliM3vhdymyNBQ3r4ibAbQY3sSQwJqbMeXSEjlvEv2q LqPQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAX4h+jbZJ3EQWkB4bRVGvmTBFZY2BcnDqdEYTPq6J1ZTwKtzyeb BYhRZHm8Bbh9Q1vtDbA0QBcC90Bom5yifQqmLeKya8qtWmQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzZYNzH1qu0t1RqPBT1k1JVpViytYv45ILtuSoyetftC0seep0Lj0w5op57K3QQKVgShFpmRRCqVOmGyuZaSjQ= X-Received: by 2002:a37:6857:: with SMTP id d84mr79603150qkc.420.1578295747186; Sun, 05 Jan 2020 23:29:07 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Avinash Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2020 12:58:56 +0530 Message-ID: To: users@dpdk.org Cc: tahiliani@nitk.edu.in, gokulbargaje.182009@nitk.edu.in X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 07 Jan 2020 18:37:41 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: [dpdk-users] Best-effort Traffic Class in DPDK X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: users-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "users" Hi, This is related to reducing no of queues per traffic class in the QoS scheduler. The 13th traffic class in the QoS scheduler is the Best-effort traffic class which can have 1 or 4 or 8 queues. https://dev.dpdk.narkive.com/ZwBXg4Xe/dpdk-dev-rfc-sched-new-features-and-improvements By default, it's 4. I want to use only one queue but when I change the configuration file it throws a segmentation fault. Any suggestions on how to use only 1 queue instead of the default 4? Thanks -Avinash