From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qk0-f180.google.com (mail-qk0-f180.google.com [209.85.220.180]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 162371B011 for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 18:59:34 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-qk0-f180.google.com with SMTP id f25so3095753qkm.0 for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 09:59:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=KOJ82PgXtquZF0xK96/hsyfz03sHRGY2HG2RkrxhHyg=; b=GpYrIf00XXbGgoGqp87yRsAeUx7ppyRBUJXphR/x89SCMdpBAiGF7Rm934e3ZFEmRE PvM/N79LP9H+7oSQYZa3PjPfjHvdc24Kumogrb/tY6rtCYKgyipU4UVw/smdTwqwHRxC WxYMQf8MdMmVw1+ShjyOSbFDNfkRX2ldY+hFc8KFziVjLzl9D1pH4IMS8lTZCuEo4zBz +j2fjS/GLlpAzkEgdII4fyd7LamqZ9D8jhZMhevfGuFAazzra3L8DTN4LrSt3wN82wPl MmQASk4KIWACN+afE9lRleZWgy1EraHMi0kI/nerR2PcMelJElAcAJuK7jvzJGQZo4FX fqOQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=KOJ82PgXtquZF0xK96/hsyfz03sHRGY2HG2RkrxhHyg=; b=BG1y5M8yBAsew8jdQESYY8faR+yYWjcPiaW9GHw7cVjbFgW+Yv8KKIcRqe/vyWtRjr wgEdLSGcDaZBqGxhUAWQlo0gSSBsvz4pQqpE7Wn2vG/pu2iyxbcTA8wPSR4rVDcpP2ID u4eFMF/YWm8BNdHRoJY3kpvTiByQbXy/mUV70fYsqaB82ZGpGFJZVKzufFJ70IQSpF6P gM7OVX0SfT7fYsondL2JodNPdz5/81jNDCKw0AoNl3sOaYJjQegbixa35KibcpzTBFdA QnOy8cZ+Yg2C5jGkI4zu5W4xK21Ycv72gmpyYBe5ilV54mhWV2Y1KM14mJXghkIhOv3N UR6A== X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPCPOlvDpfAGvuxyTuw3WZ9WUzduKDaVlq5KQ63PkCIv+qO/p/TH HKwWOy9jg3FTPkPiQdY1kDVCr6utF3lIUBjO8eM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELv2/5XezIosYJ15+pI9lsN/IPIjyJjNzqNJZ55NZ2vzMd+37pwLbj97zKg017K37kD39xj4ZSeln0puejJ4Wvg= X-Received: by 10.55.212.130 with SMTP id s2mr6537502qks.247.1519235973378; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 09:59:33 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.140.85.179 with HTTP; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 09:59:02 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: James Bensley Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 17:59:02 +0000 Message-ID: To: Yuri Axelrod , "users@dpdk.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] HP NICs DPDK support X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 17:59:34 -0000 On 14 February 2018 at 11:40, Yuri Axelrod wrote: > > Hi, > Do not see any HP NIC on the page for supported NICs. > Is HP supported, what NICs? > Regards, > Yuri Hi Yuri, There are no HP NICs listed here: http://www.dpdk.org/doc/nics However, do you have an "actual" HP NIC or just a HP "branded" NIC? I have some HP NICs in servers that are actually IntelX710 NICs branded as HP. They work just fine for me without my needing to do/change anything. Also I have an "Intel Corporation 82579LM Gigabit Network Connection" in my laptop. The 82579 range aren't under the list of support NICs but they are similar in operation to some of the supported ranges. I forced DPDK to use the NIC and it works fine for me: https://null.53bits.co.uk/uploads/linux/applications/dpdk/Ubuntu-Laptop-DPDK-NIC-Bind.txt Maybe you can do something similar. Cheers, James.