From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <matthias.gatto@outscale.com>
Received: from mail-yw0-f178.google.com (mail-yw0-f178.google.com
 [209.85.161.178]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F98937A8
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Mon,  2 May 2016 10:57:06 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-yw0-f178.google.com with SMTP id t10so273493779ywa.0
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Mon, 02 May 2016 01:57:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=outscale-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to;
 bh=kuFojgWXrtEIDAyS1u6dbTu1cJrZXHFwOp0HqGR+Ua0=;
 b=z+8M/tr4b/PaGnrnExoZ9pVc2LWjq3D9LENMJdLwTGJ23NYJEhpj4zd1JGh9KX5IZ9
 KCHkCa5FHsaOh9kXloHoPYKt5Jfrt1/dJ/zua0C1TLsbpsZim5UH5DjsmPIkt/wrIL+E
 NX3L2t6PcXaBkPpS/N1po5Zce1TIEYr/SmvKl2S02USceK8DsFykmKXPpHcE8yWsTe5l
 DEOyEv7EwfknbQY0xUxRW20/8e1Cqt4ZSRCnxweI8vTGO/3aymI7Xfpu4NCqnmMleg5s
 QTAMZeHEZk0cN2Fa9DTFFPUfRyDFMKK3v8Ng4fzuajuQauHuWkoU9mZkCDPP1q3TU8wG
 xCCg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
 :message-id:subject:from:to;
 bh=kuFojgWXrtEIDAyS1u6dbTu1cJrZXHFwOp0HqGR+Ua0=;
 b=C8UrzYhpE7ArF1qadH52mZggVVddtc7Gq9YrPtOIR8wfwRtK6cTZuX/K/GnMJSIq8C
 92EMVSyqQeE5tt5kp6I7Wdqr0bm1idDs+AgZj8JQMhWb8BNfxznlB0OemtLEgW78oHe+
 /ZtioObQ9e0p6g66fZClbRvDFNlliwA0se9Sghtb+nGENUGD396DiAYVQI+e0YfGYpar
 K4qKlRqzyT0xmVJNuOtWiy0j/nDp+qXm4sI0JNtfRelFnW/v89jSgREkJ8G6GVz+tGcS
 zT5Uyr6CzYivpnVEQZfKvGfPZS+C+dr9L2fuYANqYxDYzOgcwpUt73128lPOjSDeZ4rU
 qw9A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FUtyTEWUfiHnsEbewg0B1z0m0ZECeAguvz5ys1KkEx75EM9BbhsO5H032iSisVHoQ0kKxczHRmx4f42oC3K
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.37.228.193 with SMTP id b184mr18890053ybh.4.1462179425596;
 Mon, 02 May 2016 01:57:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.37.209.145 with HTTP; Mon, 2 May 2016 01:57:05 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAAsw5BdmsN2OyPaTE5z33dAs49mf3MXR-NyQF=G=-zKbNq_Kog@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAAsw5BdmsN2OyPaTE5z33dAs49mf3MXR-NyQF=G=-zKbNq_Kog@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 2 May 2016 10:57:05 +0200
Message-ID: <CAAsw5BdLFfi1K_SU12Z=6Mpy+xtXUELZgDaHgEOp97nZFvmYGA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Matthias Gatto <matthias.gatto@outscale.com>
To: users@dpdk.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] vhost, vxlan, and nic TSO trouble.
X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: usage discussions <users.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/users/>
List-Post: <mailto:users@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 May 2016 08:57:06 -0000

On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 3:49 PM, Matthias Gatto
<matthias.gatto@outscale.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm working on a project using DPDK:
>
> We are receiving packets from a vhost interface, then we encapsulate
> them in vxlan packets, and finally we burst them into an ixgbe nic.
>
> We set txq_flags of ixgbe nic to 0 in order to use offloading capability.
>
> During encapsulation, we add vxlan header length to l2_len field inside mbuf.
> It seems that l3_len, l4_len and tso_segsz are already set by vhost.
>
> When we use iperf3 to test our architecture, it seems that:
> - Packets with PKT_TX_TCP_CKSUM and without PKT_TX_TCP_SEG  have a
> correct checksum.
> - Packets with PKT_TX_TCP_CKSUM and with PKT_TX_TCP_SEG are segmented
> but have a bad checksum.
>
> Do you think I've missed something ?
>
> Thanks for your help
>
> -- Matthias Gatto.

ping