From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <matthias.gatto@outscale.com>
Received: from mail-yw0-f177.google.com (mail-yw0-f177.google.com
 [209.85.161.177]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75EE4E07
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 16:24:51 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-yw0-f177.google.com with SMTP id t10so214174227ywa.0
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 07:24:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=outscale-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
 h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to;
 bh=s4rPgdcZVpuCKUTzmBTZqzymeYghFXKitlu7wHXnl2I=;
 b=xq0qh1NMNHoBEPir0XzhJ5itYzhsvIkvMQEWoC3IRc2ixE93WuCD6bosADUgkdzFFD
 ZwNuvVo6HWohyFVeMzP5WhbhrVmu8Jt//9sMNpfmQQgzMwOL4YzPelfDYFV2Vkvsy0eS
 cdt1qfJo/+6nhp14cHZ+N8nil/7p6DYfSDtKKrj4+mH6dgkvlZgiU9/5jVgiCDct4u7S
 5JQjHkAvf+P/C0BHMBFiwK98Z4hFO9TG9W8a737f3JFXRPFS4H08ljdvymNSQO144H53
 s4T19R19Pxd61OoyP6BBOd30nc//wbB7TkmxF6zS4egA6iceNoAuoEhfZiMGeEJEZcmc
 PXTw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to;
 bh=s4rPgdcZVpuCKUTzmBTZqzymeYghFXKitlu7wHXnl2I=;
 b=D6aTV3bD4WPa0P5/DD+fl7+HfqDB7wT+y92II82lap5W2HdsxVlKM90oRMnB+m+jSf
 NetKNIzN9fTmoD2U7GigGt7t+/SpZ0v0O1myrPJCRCsXLlDUHiVxZklZr8tpb0+Kpyle
 9bVs4RyvX/seqvIHfobOrSO5oS1iX0CBrg5TtC0j6IWljevoh3gyCFovwPnz9kaF7ej7
 jaatcFii4tyUPaAIOrfe4JPoE13f+1RUmdamFkP+EnR7kKva2JUppsteeQkhDyNbbO42
 GbWHcojeiw0xsXcqN2gsZld/72dp0JbFbiDNwZ+V88qMocLJ2NKPwhTaK4Cmt1DUlkie
 0YoA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FVN4DwsmfBfLRIYhzvtHJV4ajvRyUEtLtzXysmuUGT+iCl/GkXzy1f1+IVKj3bOBuZ+4UjKrb2koeY6Pt9P
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.37.30.86 with SMTP id e83mr19948487ybe.79.1461594290930;
 Mon, 25 Apr 2016 07:24:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.37.90.195 with HTTP; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 07:24:50 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 16:24:50 +0200
Message-ID: <CAAsw5Begp77d0jY7BCu7jKk4XcXn5HBufPp_QRSo+Catq6sREg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Matthias Gatto <matthias.gatto@outscale.com>
To: users@dpdk.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: [dpdk-users] vhost, vxlan, and nic TSO trouble.
X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: usage discussions <users.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/users/>
List-Post: <mailto:users@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 14:24:51 -0000

Hi,
I'm working on a project using DPDK:

We are receiving packets from a vhost interface, then we encapsulate
them in vxlan packets, and finally we burst them into an ixgbe nic.

We set txq_flags of ixgbe nic to 0 in order to use offloading capability.

During encapsulation, we add vxlan header length to l2_len field inside mbuf.
It seems that l3_len, l4_len and tso_segsz are already set by vhost.

When we use iperf3 to test our architecture, it seems that:
- Packets with PKT_TX_TCP_CKSUM and without PKT_TX_TCP_SEG  have a
correct checksum.
- Packets with PKT_TX_TCP_CKSUM and with PKT_TX_TCP_SEG are segmented
but have a bad checksum.

Do you think I've missed something ?

Thanks for your help

-- Matthias Gatto