DPDK usage discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: raman geetha gopalakrishnan <glowingsun@gmail.com>
To: Nikhil Nanal <nanal@usc.edu>
Cc: users <users@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] Reg PMD & NIC
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 13:10:47 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CABAuC==r4idvoH-y4gjwp+B1fDy3ehcrRMTyuFqH2WmqOORykA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6E71A877-544C-4DAD-B7DD-CDE8F20CDA07@usc.edu>

Hi Nikhil,

Can i say that NIC's are not standardized to work in same way, rather PCI
to discover its capabilities are standardized?

Thanks
Raman

On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 12:41 PM, Nikhil Nanal <nanal@usc.edu> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I guess DPDK works only for Intel NICs. Also, there are a variety of NIC
> cards from Intel.
> The drivers are generally specific to a NIC card or a family of NIC cards.
> The DPDK, replaces the existing NIC drivers with its PMD drivers, , but
> these PMDs are
> only compatible with some specified class of Intel NIC cards and so there
> are only some supported NICs but not all.
>
> thanks
> Nikhil
>
> > On Mar 7, 2017, at 11:05 PM, raman geetha gopalakrishnan <
> glowingsun@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I have the following basic question. Hope to get an answer / link where i
> > can get myself clear.
> >
> > 1. In DPDK PMD is optimized driver for an given NIC to get maximum
> > performance.
> >    That being the case why we are talking about DPDK supported NICs.
> >
> >     A) My assumption is that NIC interface is standardized so that PMD
> > should actually work with any NIC (barring some NIC specific performance
> > tweaks)
> >          is that correct?
> >
> >     B) if #A is correct , how can i make changes to PMD to support any
> NIC
> > ?
> >
> >
> > Thanks
> > Raman
>
>

  reply	other threads:[~2017-03-08  7:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-08  7:05 raman geetha gopalakrishnan
2017-03-08  7:11 ` Nikhil Nanal
2017-03-08  7:40   ` raman geetha gopalakrishnan [this message]
2017-03-08 10:03     ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CABAuC==r4idvoH-y4gjwp+B1fDy3ehcrRMTyuFqH2WmqOORykA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=glowingsun@gmail.com \
    --cc=nanal@usc.edu \
    --cc=users@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).