From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ot0-f177.google.com (mail-ot0-f177.google.com [74.125.82.177]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CF645599; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 11:13:48 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-ot0-f177.google.com with SMTP id i1so130163613ota.3; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 03:13:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=XbU+QA0luiCQVWeE/l6ZD5g+7eF5zwJ8sVaSHFwLz78=; b=raWmKSPoux6pFbOeLDGeBcRiZyzYCNbQuEyXjLtifibk9BNji7fzVrhqTaaQ3mBTtN lAX2idHVEknF/1Dz6SS2nuFnOXQJ+x5D0s67YUYBb4ijO/T49cGeKKYDr5J22jxX1f0/ rVnANZ53ooIzr0hJXoDT0updrI5TErcYcEFRNAKVeiWft3Hngx3vN5bjfLGo4VmhCWJn QtDxRlazgwkGe5kPyHub7yKUfcY7weI0Jz0pUkczq/QY5MyK0lGpbym3oerjJ0oVx0cN VoqWGcavBl2GAg9sjR4NZDb507KRM5k33I9cHHMILU9GaGPsoE8U8tFNX3oztKOozDYm 2TCQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=XbU+QA0luiCQVWeE/l6ZD5g+7eF5zwJ8sVaSHFwLz78=; b=gB97Pi4NYpeSyxcUV3KJv+ZPLS4rA6YOY0y9gF0q+/sbMRjkOFV10FjKZUvPDXrxbt +FdQFMr3NNdB4Gfu0WLjKh6yQai3Q4+hTO9J13tluogvOiWCkmVZ7LLJXBC33qIst/Ht i8aljAWqAhDI0k6BorNfImEHwSpThwuakmiltuJwaodYAFO63ZB3N35VQvgMTvGh70UG Apt+ytGB7zhJiq7Io8/9qa59xkUpt/vlYRx0zXW1wVxxr6EKIIVQjNYS2XyulCOOf6ea W7z953plOkXQ3MGzMoIonpdLoDtHgcswqGEp/sq5Sz7mv3tMl11RSqom7wfW98PJ5QOX ZaNg== X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H3Df1LjFAxRm092qQLD7Z4q5h63CFM8/A9hhBYwXq79n4MNuuVBkjtkNFAD1kVHu4xItrqxJbawsBNSJw== X-Received: by 10.202.85.86 with SMTP id j83mr741224oib.199.1489486428294; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 03:13:48 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.251.129 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 03:13:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <6993622.nn8h5H1WbH@xps13> References: <6993622.nn8h5H1WbH@xps13> From: raman geetha gopalakrishnan Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 15:43:47 +0530 Message-ID: To: Thomas Monjalon Cc: dev@dpdk.org, users Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] [dpdk-dev] Reg DPDK with unsupported NIC X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 10:13:49 -0000 Thanks Monjalon For the quick reply. On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 3:16 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 2017-03-14 14:58, raman geetha gopalakrishnan: > > In what way i can still develop DPDK APP with non supported NIC till get > > the DPDK NIC. > > You should check the bottom of this page (section Ohers): > http://dpdk.org/doc/nics > The simplest is to use the ring PMD which do not require a NIC at all. > Or you can try the other solutions (pcap, tap, af_packet). >