From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by dpdk.space (Postfix) with ESMTP id E22B5A00E6 for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 13:36:52 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB5481B19; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 13:36:51 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-io1-f45.google.com (mail-io1-f45.google.com [209.85.166.45]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F45A11A4 for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 13:36:50 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-io1-f45.google.com with SMTP id v10so17627765iom.8 for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 05:36:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Rda25c3j00wfrUvrVYOf4koDa2a5IImy38tJLaewJcs=; b=BV6k3/Rh8J8nSst+eCuY9Rd/ZgHX9lfdPZCNEWuXr7fIiTIX8IFV35p4nEPjTgqjus 4HQstCYcdvJB5wHoYjrcFJW/zkAVArWj6foEpyGjeJnd3hcAsF31MGeHyvKHWS4uOqoz zehVjVcOLJ2AiqNadKDo/9XpMIpTbVcwcrehcYnAHEsmIMleDWi+UX5pV/XZDlYprWB2 qvxbYlRuCZLmimIEfWprCXHd0OXQwjj6nWjzUydexOd3gN/D6mNh1Y1U4+9z/oOteWri /f//jKT/i3InsfLFSuwIJWNF+poK+6j2zZmYmetW6rbpDfamzLmyuj2F/pbMa86vlWYL SLDA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Rda25c3j00wfrUvrVYOf4koDa2a5IImy38tJLaewJcs=; b=cb0Pd9u9RyQxxXp1vq3DoT96QhP9C7Ct74VVypEpFiVqfHBhVxnnOyL3Bf0U9IE7+t UP4LsiA/Km2tGb6uN2XcRTQ4WAoDb2yKkuk2J7/ASchBm0qvh24j0OeLge0zmnI8hnzb ufOncVPLPumaYwTzIA3cWww5qaYJYMDmWHIHHYc4i4amurjm7deoZGpowY5Tq58FdGr4 RZmKOuMk7toGfPTbBgsike22W135Qr2/QD930hFMsXKC8QBFqkWlYCFK1jIjYM90U+SI xz78PyGh3KVayaPWtLK3XvWTiY9h9ISb3hFA81F3Nl4aa5DAivvwo4gLxLqTW34Tqhwo yd0Q== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUg1lEnA4BPyUdwWGsvDi+NETGDuZO9uy+gBme74yuxejvqxhoO msMuMRDewl5i3eMkGo7u1fDRM2DfnIo4ktpsMh4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwmT1MevLt0XzhPoOCxBf4gJGeM827QYS8hISINyGMvNd0TdaOhprGOCeHzW7MpJHTyRIq7lCYLs5WfK2J3pAM= X-Received: by 2002:a6b:b797:: with SMTP id h145mr11354790iof.190.1552999009561; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 05:36:49 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: hirok borah Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 18:06:38 +0530 Message-ID: To: Anupama Laxmi Cc: users@dpdk.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] Allocating multiple VLANs to a single VF using SR-IOV NIC card X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: users-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "users" Hi, We have tried VFd option to unset vlan filtering (rx) and unset vlan insertion (tx) options on the VF. We are on ixgbe over 82599 ES NIC. It appears that with VFd also, RTE APIs are unable to set offloading flags on the VF. Any inputs from others would be of much help. Thanks in advance. Thanks!! On Sun, Feb 3, 2019 at 8:58 PM hirok borah wrote: > We are also facing the same issue to transport multiple vlan traffic over > one VF. Not getting a solution yet. Shall reply back if we find any. > > Any further inputs from other will be very helpful. Thanks. > > On Sun, Feb 3, 2019, 7:53 PM Anupama Laxmi >> Hi, >> >> Is there a way to allocate multiple VLANs to a single VF using SR-IOV NIC >> card ? How VLAN tagged packets can be forwarded by the KVM Hypervisor >> received via SR-IOV device from Physical Port towards the VM on DPDK >> driver >> interface ? Which DPDK driver to use igb_uio or vfio-pci? Also which DPDK >> 18.08 RTE API's can be used to read what VLAN id is set on the Host VF, >> from the guest? >> >> Thanks, >> > -- Regards, -Hirok