From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <kusumanjali47@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-it1-f172.google.com (mail-it1-f172.google.com
 [209.85.166.172]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81B3A31FC
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Mon,  5 Nov 2018 13:56:28 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-it1-f172.google.com with SMTP id e11so9085094itl.5
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Mon, 05 Nov 2018 04:56:28 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
 h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=UjjxIEmvPuM8affxDgKA3fEFIJjHTQzFRzWL8Aua+o4=;
 b=Ace/DpmHEJ0RrV8u2EojUujrS8H+6bPsy3+PHuePgD+X/uYSScl5+PIIs+VPb7fpmx
 4uWCgeu2/3wc0jyfXa6BolbuZH8AfcXLTm4KMHDo8D6DDszLu6/6hLxWc4jkrsC9eATU
 W/pKFjCCu5pxZ4ggcLEE7OP7jWqavXDrQ5WgMQRoZwTF8Idl8i9gx7HdOPLnB4ec84AM
 u/ceZVicDi9W5wIq05D0SMJ06GXfjhS0srq9TP2RWdq/7Hi7AqcrOzzChe17WGdAVOwt
 Esug1zjHCG5TVav/3DoRxLQJgxQWFR1CuorNt3+Tj85JraQM+nlkrN33+X3qScZ5VJSb
 3szw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=UjjxIEmvPuM8affxDgKA3fEFIJjHTQzFRzWL8Aua+o4=;
 b=hxtOw7/xoax7ZdSt/rZvpkQqC51Z89pwK0T4sYluwShaQTgj+Jpaves9sYyygL9d+z
 z3iBrNcQl01l+YP27gZSQl1/Qn8XfuSUYVTL2E1EtB9Gh5UbPTbwk5SGraHSA3Gc0lUh
 zoRkEX0fJEq5tg9eIRZysN/F0+G68kq+UdD19C+6sy7slrlDT4/iTDCD0j9eba+jE19z
 ytKUBmSXukJIdpallfUsCf+m0V1WsOlj2jdllSROujrftNnTJbt7V5jZqXZ1zmAjIQfr
 VvxxfowE5NkTvFqsqfuyAs7wXPhfQPEwT16jEHcxLuDK53x3r7yxyc+5+uf/EJTCD/Wt
 niLw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gLMBYTmSRN19tLkZ7sv5u8jcLaX8mXIQiUSmKnrxwK2jx4EPuRE
 gUUbwCdjIbXBWJCV4b8kqMlZ05UvIiOOTog0vVhv027j
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5cGqKRRvGDloxWVPjrMqLQZUn9kFVtFuO3cjPG0JEfhO55x7VkuA9yjq0+1mTs1A2bSb04MSSeT3mEbLlhBEKg=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:660c:802:: with SMTP id
 j2mr6218432itk.13.1541422587428; 
 Mon, 05 Nov 2018 04:56:27 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Kusuma DS <kusumanjali47@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2018 18:26:16 +0530
Message-ID: <CABN7GFGAnF9jc3ceXoVVxw9Y9v_Y7PWPkktn5E2WHT2FE2MXjg@mail.gmail.com>
To: users@dpdk.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: [dpdk-users] Question on Multiple process support Application
X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK usage discussions <users.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/users/>
List-Post: <mailto:users@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2018 12:56:28 -0000

Hii,

I have some doubts regarding multiple process example application.

I have 2 processes running in my setup using multiprocess client and server
concept, am doing rx_burst in server process and tx_burst in client
process. But the thing is i have one isolated cpu, So both the process are
sharing the cpu.

What i understand through the document provided by the dpdk is  In the
concept of memory pool there will be per core cache lock, so if we try to
do tx and rx in different process there will be software cache problem will
occur, so there will be corrupting the memory in shared memory pool.

How to resolve this issue??If anyone Know about this issue please let me
know.

Thanks,
Kusuma