From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <javicoleto44@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-lf0-f49.google.com (mail-lf0-f49.google.com
 [209.85.215.49]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6A3E275D
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 13:30:59 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-lf0-f49.google.com with SMTP id e190so15120593lfe.0
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 04:30:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :cc; bh=PcCKrOHegbjTIkitjp+GpuNWZNBmbd0TPfZKwpYHPJg=;
 b=dCv9CVC67PF3Y0Skbs2doNf1giHawRNbHbj/vKNWKQnnHd0ca24M+Xl64elwnj/+Vf
 wz5o5DwOuDwQxhNhmTNOb0vUdWr1rF0BOxWl3f/FH3NfgsJLp+9cNlkmvzkk5hX27gsQ
 aNDAhdhGUxfWDCrNs2bo5A/ETHPJDj2tOh15hJ+A3DEomSiBev/WGYPcwxQulxfsH/kv
 nShDOXpzO/fiI82MwOH0RZWSUhFSN0E/h+nYTqiUKylZLv9tqJiWFFnfHSJe9BZC7hc9
 +KeTrtPxhjK3+HvhQ1eXUBoDzaCGkxHjAB3xIuiYBWIi8FpXUWTE1NWJ7LcvHhtrVDX9
 KXyw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
 :message-id:subject:from:to:cc;
 bh=PcCKrOHegbjTIkitjp+GpuNWZNBmbd0TPfZKwpYHPJg=;
 b=j1EhMeq3m57+jbnbr6ykzutiAKIazP5QzBWuZLP2yh4/sgGSygYHHcYZCiy2NmSYfo
 Ew+loY8l0d17nli6LqWw9/Lyk9tTjs/35Boi4UdH01ZQNiB073O1TQDC4IQw8ksdqH0M
 uok9Ze1xeR7WKsrMgxfCpVFEKvhfPNRrrPVuOJTpALUmkIJ0m2vI/EfVxcVGL72jCopC
 FPPVO7G91fFD1wAo8npHoD4NnKNtuws/IWD/pxPiwVxaNXQmCrnCy9wnA/jQW3VmznqU
 d0DHfkCsr2RMSfxtQ3qu76wjriejw9/Tv+uTv9pVX55GHzh9pi7GWOwOiEb9lIvc5Pvi
 QfoQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FXDS5V+oowKmHfmWE2yEsfW3qZmyRkVTbkEVrLPNTNn0HXXistuZyxQeOedoxh/VwqBa0GHJ9BPXJaW0Q==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.25.157.79 with SMTP id g76mr1167050lfe.41.1461065459483;
 Tue, 19 Apr 2016 04:30:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.112.164.40 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 04:30:59 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <5EB9C3E4-6F8A-4C9D-AA53-848B14227A13@intel.com>
References: <CABbgvkurz25E9VZZCi=FJaPDbVQF2ky-vu1w-+bQTEZRauPP_Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOysbxoXvywFhhk+yAofSZ6_HEan8Yoi90NumQsvP_vZ8=UySg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CABbgvkvYVic4xHxPnsmep-Gch14PBBaAcb8rdW2ZN1sf2b6E6g@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOysbxqQ78cavhAJV8WJXViN2YKO5-KmxJHbT0bFugOyDMG-rA@mail.gmail.com>
 <DB548632-32B0-431B-85B8-CFFC75771831@intel.com>
 <CABbgvktqO_jWdJ3XtazYzhZRUj8-mBDUhAhuTCMZGa7LW0wsbQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOysbxqH+o9MRQQgj06rmHJdt4gKeYGWOVy-tueMPP+_CMBQOA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CABbgvkv25Q0MT_izqFc8on-YJaTJ49ne1-kJzkzupGDyy-XF1g@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOysbxqKv3qNg5h9ZK6bQUG+LXsOu0aKuP4th3RcHdaq2iXRyQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <1492D1F8-C60F-440F-846D-D69E60395657@intel.com>
 <CABbgvktiJ+aHNTT1WqN3B6euuQ5G7UHUn-YpHZP2YGWtboto=w@mail.gmail.com>
 <5EB9C3E4-6F8A-4C9D-AA53-848B14227A13@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 13:30:59 +0200
Message-ID: <CABbgvktT3e0TCh=Qq_utTbVXJGud0LCGTseUdc_HCHWDR+gJ_w@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Javier_Coleto_Fern=C3=A1ndez?= <javicoleto44@gmail.com>
To: "Wiles, Keith" <keith.wiles@intel.com>
Cc: Andriy Berestovskyy <aber@semihalf.com>, users <users@dpdk.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] mbuf free cnt not decreasing
X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: usage discussions <users.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/users/>
List-Post: <mailto:users@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 11:31:00 -0000

I don't use any update/set call to modify the reference counter, but I have
a theory about it.
Is it possible the mbufs are being accessed too fast after being set and
just before the reference counter has been updated internally?
I say so because I got a PANIC error after enabling MEMPOOL debugging. It
said 'bad ref cnt' and the dump stack pointed to rte_kni_tx_burst(), so I
thought this could be an explanation for that error.
Any ideas?

Regards,
Javier