From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <javicoleto44@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-lf0-f47.google.com (mail-lf0-f47.google.com
 [209.85.215.47]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12E7E32A5
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 10:41:13 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-lf0-f47.google.com with SMTP id c126so208232925lfb.2
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 01:41:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :cc; bh=KoekOMoW1FR21pn5zOHZFXqidLxlfrL4l5qMNDqjf2E=;
 b=O3JmIF4n4JHkGbfXK8x12sCuDvg5K5kgh3B2cRsPk7JnAv9V0H86w5dvBPQghccxvJ
 JfGuwKSdgZA1JdWRua/TmFQdrBQWP5TyHpzNjD1O8GiY9Vzk/C3fwUwLC3+Rfifa9DAC
 PoJV9zqW7Zvtpk+YA1degldQDJqrzuTA911M6LlvvVpA098/i1Y5IDVfgzH6suzVkRov
 kneU36NeBB8oiQ4iQ2Ol+g89xEO64mNtkq6ngKej/5hfNeEhUYv3oRV6T7avoxUTbWDn
 esa/xlZGkYZtfoeRLRvo+eCl9bvAldENY5wXyblxo39O1eFLKn7aDvZN/z9Kp7plFneR
 hWeQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
 :message-id:subject:from:to:cc;
 bh=KoekOMoW1FR21pn5zOHZFXqidLxlfrL4l5qMNDqjf2E=;
 b=DirfvzQM+lBeASm2l6YjH8IZyuK9K8UToHvcZgiR+SPbzNBL33nqM5ivydK1Axm5AY
 7LB/d0dThF9qDvvqWT9QT9597uWoVG+WSeTbIGQLiZRqLk26ryuhX00r7tep7piwSHcM
 DTlKcaYS36g5o8hVTtsKxIbhvySc2kOd4vqUValT6W54DUHsJt4vn4iYlqz6mUt6HSlg
 OtcgdZu0ANZtY7Pdpxfgwne0U9s9MHlSvCJxodBxE7MpVfLs5SlBKF4oT1bYIQts87Ow
 7OT6whn4QiQpYG1n69cdiFfzXNj3T9XVfW93r6pl+qCdyZH96bClNmqIckhE7Ody+wz3
 SShQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FWkw8NAWsmW5zLVfVeQeizS+55974zmZSMFzdHUvvEameKBwDJ/r3wSWODm9fm1mfvIX238M1iczEK31g==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.51.48 with SMTP id h16mr13664748lbo.7.1460968872716;
 Mon, 18 Apr 2016 01:41:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.112.164.40 with HTTP; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 01:41:12 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAOysbxoXvywFhhk+yAofSZ6_HEan8Yoi90NumQsvP_vZ8=UySg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABbgvkurz25E9VZZCi=FJaPDbVQF2ky-vu1w-+bQTEZRauPP_Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOysbxoXvywFhhk+yAofSZ6_HEan8Yoi90NumQsvP_vZ8=UySg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 10:41:12 +0200
Message-ID: <CABbgvkvYVic4xHxPnsmep-Gch14PBBaAcb8rdW2ZN1sf2b6E6g@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Javier_Coleto_Fern=C3=A1ndez?= <javicoleto44@gmail.com>
To: Andriy Berestovskyy <aber@semihalf.com>
Cc: users@dpdk.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] mbuf free cnt not decreasing
X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: usage discussions <users.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/users/>
List-Post: <mailto:users@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 08:41:13 -0000

Hi Andriy,

Thank you for your answer.
I've tried what you said and determined it's an mbuf leak, because the
number of free mbufs doesn't stabilize, even when I increase the number of
mbufs in the mempool.
Is there any way to easily debug this mbuf leak? I didn't make the full
code, so I don't really know where to start looking for leaks.

Regards,
Javier