From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-it0-f42.google.com (mail-it0-f42.google.com [209.85.214.42]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 625B1695C for ; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 11:44:09 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-it0-f42.google.com with SMTP id y18so6508542itc.1 for ; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 03:44:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=mO+1EE6AD2T484xRRa1/9iLGbSP5sPV6wIYBRQyAXeI=; b=D9Lvbpec9OshHBNKRQ8vAq5WkvX3dU2Z0IRKUcGPenyH1IEXXt8GMfM8uPZxQARmdF ybmpKfZQYIX9gaS5Z51Phb+YMBmHf60nAegSjp6xjjyiyT8uF//c11FzDQqu7HY3YSHw Kufly8rFi5bDzSp41PiGttwUHdW3dFOK8+pmNWTvC3OICBT8ltNsiWYu6gR/V9LMPY2H cOPYqHJopQNbdsmB0PWghJWkGHKOdmvXLdvTqwv5PQ6U3n1kOrX069eLY6SQ/kuTUOyQ FMsQPT+Np0OREo6/iYRK6Cor2oe4oxsMoQNdxLwq8EWB/jW8xTTLFSHtgH3ghgYRS/RK +cwQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=mO+1EE6AD2T484xRRa1/9iLGbSP5sPV6wIYBRQyAXeI=; b=BSoTCOoR4bcRDM3iT3md7SO9a9hDkdhD3YzF/v+/ws/Oj/GuHXIbvlonEAKwsRfTqu MFN9fOu/8jQjPm2OqXDoYptws7gPlXFckmIGnIKEMsTh/Zh8MLRYxlpL59ddcQuAe7eK PQz8PTXl7aKoliTfS96NqHHWJk6zh6cUgEd1QhEKhLvpN+IltOLwzNArvmdi2PN/1dhp rcTU52ugHltXgobKzqCJCAfUdGOXs7wM8z6gMhNdMvQz5q3eciagBdRf0zn65hZ6iGeM lhKZLAM9HIKi+paJ6ZVdSNwd85EiGSCj+ZvamaHzvjCzo6jhLuRTixaVnjLhGrLkT46l CTZA== X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H0Zvz820Nc1+NTVoRRlrUQZCZAwk5KjEIAqmlZ+J//DFRx8YvXu3r4S64hVOt3wnYbWxfC4HGacIiC8vA== X-Received: by 10.36.17.210 with SMTP id 201mr2012372itf.84.1490093048500; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 03:44:08 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Nanda Gopal Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 10:43:58 +0000 Message-ID: To: users@dpdk.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: [dpdk-users] Regarding chained mbufs + gcm crypto X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 10:44:09 -0000 Hello, >>From the documentation, http://dpdk.org/doc/guides/cryptodevs/aesni_gcm.html , I see that - Chained mbufs are supported but only out-of-place (destination mbuf must be contiguous). 1. Is there a plan to remove limitation in the future? 2. How would a packet larger than the configured buffer size be handled in DPDK? My use case revolves around the decryption of a reassembled encrypted packet with a bigger size.( chained buffers) Regards, {Nanda]