From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD25FA3160 for ; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 06:05:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6010C1E8DC; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 06:05:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-wm1-f46.google.com (mail-wm1-f46.google.com [209.85.128.46]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49EFD1E8D4 for ; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 06:05:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm1-f46.google.com with SMTP id 7so5293659wme.1 for ; Wed, 09 Oct 2019 21:05:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Nov3de18daweDut+g+q25idadTJAFm1IP6+PvrS3b6g=; b=QHqZZovsiwFvD/TCwXBXdhclBhvQl0Yz4BQC9O+fOXpndTba9kQLNMWJWjfExCwjlk mcE/aUf/YKa5+9MlL+JAQc+FDCs2eP0+/NXGfA5RmOTbPlJ4ZUddnLLXYg599kwZ+vwv AECSAR/hbSvtR2W3rSKeHRP35/aI98RECnORcNKclWIJP7GDZYIJizcCAhS006+3Fh4u H9mTKqAbT9Hp3rQFT0kULzheR0wf9GbQp+2o5EDfS/dKOZrDQTnOD42irP4GTwDAiUhC 29z4hPRR1sj9B5Bk9W3xUpIZikIXRCE/kcpx7kQx4h/DVibR+Cj5Bz7lhxqfGm47FuoG 8CLQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Nov3de18daweDut+g+q25idadTJAFm1IP6+PvrS3b6g=; b=b/HV0z2LhYdH90hfgZeZrKMJRZy+bl4Ray9gBFxn5il531WNc9qKzD31jony/OpJWG HoTAMtlc39adWF0vmQ9eHJFdHmbTWob8PTrIvEN/EqYr0VFEj67+xmp8pFp8ZOaTbF/0 2yGQjmbgAV/g3Grm6Q9Ali3O2SteerUC/JmWkJgCeFQR/8SdWBJxMZvt3w/xVO/W1db2 LvbglJaCAeJY7c4EtKdq3/cVX7U0zcPAvgYILT0uRY5GEsA/11NnbtHFglYyNW0w89I3 p0OIe0A0kQh7vXcocW2x4sqYsGtWnxziXvOIpop2A/Coec3ffmSUi9xXtkFxhWl3nO2w Gplw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWBLcEbR8boQMDFyt0lTNS+vckLabjQciouEB73tsEp0GzRF9Zj hlDyT/b3W62h4yVEMV9PbVSFQsJOIdrT7DM2TdE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqy0s59mN4RrTVLHqybjOoAHbcjxJpXgTvrY3Cb/gO0NroMsVmGSMtOH+m4aLdD+JvNY9DAY89S/X28YwnY8FqQ= X-Received: by 2002:a1c:ed04:: with SMTP id l4mr5746786wmh.116.1570680308868; Wed, 09 Oct 2019 21:05:08 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20191008201224.083c9625@hermes.lan> <20191009180856.41575900@hermes.lan> In-Reply-To: <20191009180856.41575900@hermes.lan> From: Jun Gan Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2019 21:04:57 -0700 Message-ID: To: Stephen Hemminger Cc: Asaf Penso , "users@dpdk.org" , Technical Support Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] Same 5 tuple UDP packets have been delivered to different queues. X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: users-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "users" Hi Stephen, Thanks for the help, it turns out that it's because of a coding error. I have fixed that and it's working well now. On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 6:09 PM Stephen Hemminger wrote: > On Tue, 8 Oct 2019 21:29:46 -0700 > Jun Gan wrote: > > > Hi Stephen, > > > > Thanks for the suggestion, I actually tried both, but no difference, the > > problem for me is that same src&dsp ip&port udp packets, will be > delivered > > to different queues. > > > > That breaks my assumption that the packet from some session will be > > processed by the same thread on the server. > > > > so besides rx_adv_conf, is there any other things I have to configure? > > What is value of rss_hash in the received packet, is it the same? > Also what environment HW, NIC, etc? > -- Jun Gan