From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C5BF45484 for ; Mon, 17 Jun 2024 21:37:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4055E402DA; Mon, 17 Jun 2024 21:37:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-pj1-f53.google.com (mail-pj1-f53.google.com [209.85.216.53]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1779402BD for ; Mon, 17 Jun 2024 21:37:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pj1-f53.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2c4c7eb425fso3770571a91.1 for ; Mon, 17 Jun 2024 12:37:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1718653058; x=1719257858; darn=dpdk.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=d2Ecb7ApPX5qbOrX2BCGZwnyKDI5ZLCszsKgDNLBMoI=; b=K88WjsA+YUtvSlm6DqDcbrE+7kNGk9o0lBYltQRRTm22pOtIUbsqC6zkSssVA8jeu4 anzWmyYmx6vzHTmxdLaaU2otkuU/A/FEUYwB5o614hIz2z1/ELU7dVycIwPd/TSQotoX lEzNcIeCDit4L2327NLVuwqvyMuXIR8Y7y0I03nFPXBXcTwHiNY3Tw0eiA3WOx2Vn8eP Wsn0KI0zbpgMp9D01F/pmWGLpU/DCUvwzZ975hvbL8y6MM0MmdWiVbisEftjJ3epWLAK UF477VRbKYEM33XgiPkAnXL+Q33+aTjxazz/Tgv9wdhrKh4KwH5EpaeRhmqLQMujWNL4 +l1w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1718653058; x=1719257858; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=d2Ecb7ApPX5qbOrX2BCGZwnyKDI5ZLCszsKgDNLBMoI=; b=fAGR4XFtKbzOpsvLYbXh4XgM9uj0k7uY+9QDJKAYbl7VtsUkhqTtaMG4DV0Hz8wNcl pMoCU88wT0ra+2cUmpBKbB85edhiJatMDIkY4aeGQbhyz2/pgAuDoJWRlWDjG7v7TVgC cY7PTjpUZSe+Sh/ne5Ljm8brE3B6/7wBxlYTdoJkG2El27ZzyDPcygnM/H1uQYp5bt+I MJqYtUxeQWEfS4fBrjFtaPOT0jVJWoNkWWglXNsNz+o661ar/3p8ykutQ8QqUaO8Jkb5 dkxo5CsojRt+z9GNTHx0YPcGtrK99spWskt668jdn4xlK8mbyr3UFWuHt3yxjMgaV2nA WLTg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yykr4fs2BKDDphAEppOV9J0M9ZGVNJVPP472nIuuWZZNbauv1U9 xrLHeJH5UG2CiWoIchpl864GcRj75a6g7HpbR7tQKHzTVmYx04yBfY2jDqJjFoum9ZlAcNxfM77 iXTEeX6V+0Jnvs4ah1/yMjFLtNbyzog== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEL9emcjjXWn1b+g0jVzViEg45BZ827GH2Udsa9MHUdtXZHdN6fYRL3Wv+NjN7KUG5caS0tUnGyJd5bQlBIX3Q= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:bc8b:b0:2c2:8d49:5e6c with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2c4db1322f8mr9327684a91.7.1718653057559; Mon, 17 Jun 2024 12:37:37 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20240617083049.412242fb@hermes.local> In-Reply-To: From: Isaac Boukris Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2024 22:37:25 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: dumpcap: weird failure with six IPv6 hosts in the filter To: Stephen Hemminger Cc: users@dpdk.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: users-bounces@dpdk.org > Just a quick update that I still see the issue in my env with the > master branch (24.07.0-rc0), I'm now testing by adding the filter to > 'sample_filters' in test_bpf.c and running: > time sudo build/app/dpdk-test bpf_convert_autotest > > With 5 hosts it takes less than 2 secs, with 6 it takes about 25 secs, > i'll try to strace it maybe. strace was useless, no syscalls for ~18 secs, not sure how to debug it further, valgrind / callgrind don't work on dpdk.. It doesn't seem to be about the size though, I was able to produce larger bpf code with ipv4 addresses and it worked fine too.