Hi Bing,
Thanks for the quick reply.  The results are...

With a single hairpin queue I get approx the same rate for both
patterns, ~54Gbps.  I assume this is less than the RSS rates due to
fewer queues?
flow create 0 ingress group 1 pattern eth / end actions count / queue
index 6 / end
flow create 0 ingress group 1 pattern eth / ipv4 / end actions count /
queue index 6 / end

With the split ipv6/ipv4 I'm getting ~124Gbps

flow create 0 ingress group 1 priority 1 pattern eth / ipv6 / end
actions count / rss queues 6 7 8 9 end / end
flow create 0 ingress group 1 priority 1 pattern eth / ipv4 / end
actions count / rss queues 6 7 8 9 end / end

testpmd> flow list 0
ID Group Prio Attr Rule
0 0 0 i-- => JUMP
1 1 1 i-- ETH IPV6 => COUNT RSS
2 1 1 i-- ETH IPV4 => COUNT RSS

On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 8:10 AM Bing Zhao <bingz@nvidia.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Tony,
>
> Could you also try to test with:
> 1. QUEUE action instead of RSS and check 1 queue performance.
> 2. when trying to test IPv4 only case, try the following 3 commands with this order -
>         flow create 0 ingress group 0 pattern end actions jump group 1 / end
>         flow create 0 ingress group 1 pattern priority 1 eth / ipv6 / end actions count / rss queues 6 7 8 9 end / end
>         flow create 0 ingress group 1 pattern priority 1 eth / ipv4 / end actions count / rss queues 6 7 8 9 end / end
>
> BR. Bing
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Tony Hart <tony.hart@domainhart.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2024 7:39 PM
> > To: users@dpdk.org
> > Subject: Performance of CX7 with 'eth' pattern versus 'eth/ipv4' in hairpin
> >
> > External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
> >
> >
> > I'm using a CX7 and testing hairpin queues.  The test traffic is entirely
> > IPv4+UDP with distributed SIP,DIP pairs and received packets are u-turned via
> > hairpin in the CX7 (single 400G interface).
> >
> > I see different performance when I use a pattern of 'eth' versus 'eth/ipv4' in
> > the hairpin flow entry.  From testing it seems that specifying just 'eth' is
> > sufficient to invoke RSS and 'eth/ipv4'
> > should be equivalent since the traffic is all ipv4, but I'm getting ~104Gbps for
> > the 'eth' pattern and  ~124Gbps for 'eth/ipv4' pattern.
> >
> > Any thoughts on why there is such a performance difference here?
> >
> > thanks
> > tony
> >
> > This is the 'eth' pattern testpmd commands flow create 0 ingress group 0
> > pattern end actions jump group 1 / end flow create 0 ingress group 1 pattern
> > eth / end actions count / rss queues 6 7 8 9 end / end
> >
> > The testpmd commands for 'eth/ipv4'
> > flow create 0 ingress group 0 pattern end actions jump group 1 / end flow
> > create 0 ingress group 1 pattern eth / ipv4 / end actions count / rss queues 6 7
> > 8 9 end / end
> >
> >
> > This is the testpmd command line...
> > dpdk-testpmd -l8-14 -a81:00.0,dv_flow_en=1 -- -i --nb-cores 6 --rxq 6 --txq 6
> > --port-topology loop --forward-mode=rxonly --hairpinq 4 --hairpin-mode
> > 0x10
> >
> > Versions
> > mlnx-ofa_kernel-24.04-OFED.24.04.0.6.6.1.rhel9u4.x86_64
> > kmod-mlnx-ofa_kernel-24.04-OFED.24.04.0.6.6.1.rhel9u4.x86_64
> > mlnx-ofa_kernel-devel-24.04-OFED.24.04.0.6.6.1.rhel9u4.x86_64
> > ofed-scripts-24.04-OFED.24.04.0.6.6.x86_64
> >
> > DPDK: v24.03



--
tony