From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <qsxqian@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-wm0-f41.google.com (mail-wm0-f41.google.com [74.125.82.41])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D83B88D8E
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Wed,  9 May 2018 04:53:53 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-wm0-f41.google.com with SMTP id f8-v6so24852691wmc.4
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Tue, 08 May 2018 19:53:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
 h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=/kJm8T7hUqzcWzEFqopdAQ3U8Voq4t6Sq15JMJL0B7c=;
 b=uaAYgvR9Zew09NEkqF2Sz6jo6FCDN2hREU66P8lAfRGnJqCkOgrWFwNoQbr5h0lfqk
 PnyDD9XwAOehyu5hAo8VfMjMiHdW8HsItCI5gjYIAvUnZ4LyZdURqEJVF4cg6CCrEkxD
 r1NKwUBVvBCJrFU7CYKbTfsBgULLkPPi3ZUAjv/V/agdGiYt3X10Om8Oo/3I7YJKDrJ4
 s1aqRD2O1mUulv9F/0r2k4jxbUoc8UkIrARuze1mwbMklSJ7bcJUHjQ1tNeZo9RGD6fG
 00dCloDkO18RXcBcRg7vRJEZ7duT8XYECDaDyDC/GeIrCYImvy+M18YI+unlEGpcKuuq
 mufg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=/kJm8T7hUqzcWzEFqopdAQ3U8Voq4t6Sq15JMJL0B7c=;
 b=BwfaWKHJ4qrnOx7hhqcTNfmCctzCaQCMipW1W9qH4v2u80EBUhhN9//OIPj4OieUgq
 wajCxPC1YnpaWRuwqjOO7Pr7Bk4BBotGPRV+atG9bjTEfmcYwGuoLYAp0KUDMMigt9fu
 WzaWwMQWvxawCRrs/MGyw5HWUHaDV97Ewvty0a8QV0rtJfHdfYv9Te739d28yA2yQHz1
 S97bdCXf5AB8p/ih8t+zPC/2WMiQSMcghG9RcBEL3lLCrUIteiktgyzGtkm70MeD7Dk/
 zFwTOO6HCbqYIfhrjrIvJTJprn1j2MnMShCQiGcCmlKRFpILCdJcOCrQHQhkWSJXJww8
 7Vaw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALKqPwcShvUY/vPFLAsX1O/Bo3KQZk8JWew8THaw7se1ptBi5GDlsQeV
 uc5lVc/S7ZIZFf+4Tm/W3QvPHE0ef8uxwtjwoeBA3zD7
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZrJJSgm//vvDDXShpsuQMntbg1WJjKypuqFnw1Q1qmORGCJHH0JTxMfLRkDOjvSfRgJ4HbRUoh0u+8p3fUZZOY=
X-Received: by 2002:a1c:d755:: with SMTP id
 o82-v6mr4130317wmg.71.1525834433532; 
 Tue, 08 May 2018 19:53:53 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.28.11.71 with HTTP; Tue, 8 May 2018 19:53:53 -0700 (PDT)
From: sx qian <qsxqian@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 May 2018 10:53:53 +0800
Message-ID: <CACEjtCEok5-tgL09Y_kUprW0=oTcF2sVKTmOyMe2ov4rarxQgA@mail.gmail.com>
To: users@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 09 May 2018 12:28:00 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: [dpdk-users] =?utf-8?q?The_latency_of_dpdk_receiver_packet_is_mor?=
	=?utf-8?q?e_than_400us=3F_something_wrong_with_it=EF=BC=9F?=
X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK usage discussions <users.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://dpdk.org/ml/options/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/users/>
List-Post: <mailto:users@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 May 2018 02:53:54 -0000

NIC: Intel 82599ES
DPDK version: 17.08.1


My test model is like this=EF=BC=9A
 Host A send request packet to host B=EF=BC=8Cwhen host B  receive the requ=
est
packet=EF=BC=8Chost B send replay packet to host A=E3=80=82Then host A send=
 next request to
host B ...

When the request packet size is less than or equal to  128 bytes, it works
fine. the round trip latency is less than 12us. But if the packet size is
more than 128 bytes=EF=BC=88even 129bytes),The latency is more than 400us=
=E3=80=82

I find that  most of the time consumed in the receiving package.

In my application, I call the rte_eth_tx_burst()  about every 1us.

What may be the cause? The NIC or dpdk driver receive packet made some
batch?