DPDK usage discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kai Zhang <kay21s@gmail.com>
To: "Wiles, Keith" <keith.wiles@intel.com>
Cc: "users@dpdk.org" <users@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] Issue with more Cores assigned: Cannot mmap device resource file
Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2017 11:21:17 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACKSPmcby5CQxUcQ4KMSpRQM5Y-+be2aP+jGK6Tnyue2r6cueA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BFB208A1-96F9-46FC-9BCA-C0C571DF0007@intel.com>

Command line:
primary:      sudo ./primary -l 0,1,2,3 -n 4 --proc-type=primary
secondary: sudo ./secondary -l 4,5,6,7,8 -n 4 --proc-type=secondary

The configurations are as follows:
A) 1 x Intel E5-2650 v4, 12 cores [UMA],     XL710 40GbE, bind 02:00.0,
 2048 x 4k huge page
02:00.0 *Ethernet* controller: Intel Corporation *Ethernet* Controller
XL710 for 40GbE QSFP+ (rev 02)  * [<<- Only bind this one]*
02:00.1 *Ethernet* controller: Intel Corporation *Ethernet* Controller
XL710 for 40GbE QSFP+ (rev 02)
05:00.0 *Ethernet* controller: Intel Corporation I210 Gigabit Network
Connection (rev 03)
06:00.0 *Ethernet* controller: Intel Corporation I210 Gigabit Network
Connection (rev 03)
        Socket 0
--------
Core 0  [0, 12]
Core 1  [1, 13]
Core 2  [2, 14]
Core 3  [3, 15]
Core 4  [4, 16]
Core 5  [5, 17]
Core 8  [6, 18]
Core 9  [7, 19]
Core 10 [8, 20]
Core 11 [9, 21]
Core 12 [10, 22]
Core 13 [11, 23]

B) 2 x Intel E5-2640 v4, 10 cores [NUMA],      No Port Bind,    2048 x 4k
huge page
05:00.0 *Ethernet* controller: Intel Corporation I210 Gigabit Network
Connection (rev 03)
06:00.0 *Ethernet* controller: Intel Corporation I210 Gigabit Network
Connection (rev 03)
        Socket 0        Socket 1
        --------        --------
Core 0  [0, 20]         [10, 30]
Core 1  [1, 21]         [11, 31]
Core 2  [2, 22]         [12, 32]
Core 3  [3, 23]         [13, 33]
Core 4  [4, 24]         [14, 34]
Core 8  [5, 25]         [15, 35]
Core 9  [6, 26]         [16, 36]
Core 10 [7, 27]         [17, 37]
Core 11 [8, 28]         [18, 38]
Core 12 [9, 29]         [19, 39]

Ah, as machine B does not have a 40GbE, I did not bind any NIC and run my
program with locally generated packets. But I am using other DPDK features,
such as memory sharing and message passing. Maybe that is the reason it
works correctly? I can only access machine B remotely, so I am unable to
install a NIC on it. I have another PC that is used as a client that only
has four cores, which also cannot be used for verification...

Regards,
Kai


On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 2:59 AM, Wiles, Keith <keith.wiles@intel.com> wrote:

>
> > On Mar 11, 2017, at 9:45 AM, Kai Zhang <kay21s@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Keith,
> >
> > Thank you for your reply.
> >
> > I have tested my program on two machines
> > A) 1 x Intel E5-2650 v4, 12 cores [UMA]
> > B) 2 x Intel E5-2640 v4, 10 cores [NUMA]
> >
> > I am very sure that the primary process uses different cores with the
> secondary process. The strange thing is that my program works correctly on
> machine B. But on machine A, the above issue happens with more than 4 cores
> assigned to the secondary process.
> >
> > I have tried to assign cores 1-5  to the secondary process and also
> tried other core assignment policies, but the error still happens
> rte_eal_init() with more than 4 cores.
>
> It would be nice to see both command lines. I am not sure I can help more
> all I can do is suggest some ideas to look at.
>
> Does machine B have the same number and type of NICs? Use ‘lspci | grep
> Ethernet’ to get a list of all Ethernet devices on both machines.
>
> What is the number of hugepages you have allocated for both machines.
>
> Also look at the cpu_layout.py script to see why adding the 5th core would
> be different on the two machines and try to make them the same.
>
> >
> > Regards,
> > Kai
> >
> > On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 10:52 PM, Wiles, Keith <keith.wiles@intel.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > On Mar 10, 2017, at 9:35 PM, Kai Zhang <kay21s@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi, there
> > >
> > > I am using DPDK-16.11 on XL710 40GbE NIC. OS: CentOS 7.3.1611 with
> Linux
> > > kernel version 3.8.0-30.
> > >
> > > I have a master process and a secondary process. When I run the
> secondary
> > > process with less than or equal to 4 cores, it works correctly. Such
> as:
> > > sudo ./program -l 4,5,6,7 -n 4 --proc-type=secondary
> > > sudo ./program -c 0x0f -n 4 --proc-type=secondary
> > >
> > > However, there will be error in the rte_eal_init if I assign more than
> 4
> > > cores.
> > > sudo ./program -l 0,1,2,3,4 -n 4 --proc-type=secondary
> > > sudo ./program -c 0x1f -n 4 --proc-type=secondary
> > >
> > > EAL: Cannot mmap device resource file
> > > /sys/bus/pci/devices/0000:02:00.0/resource0 to address: 0x7fff65bfc000
> > > EAL: Error - exiting with code: 1
> > >  Cause: Requested device 0000:02:00.0 cannot be used
> >
> > I assume you have at least 8 cores. Have you tried -l 1-5 on the
> secondary process.
> >
> > You did not show the primary process command line, but the if you use
> 1-5 then you can only give primary process -l 6-7 or two cores. It is
> always a reasonable thing is to leave core zero for linux to use.
> >
> > Also it could be you ran out of memory or hugepages you allocated to the
> system.
> >
> > >
> > > Anyone knows why this happens?
> > >
> > > Thanks a lot,
> > > Kai Zhang
> >
> > Regards,
> > Keith
> >
> >
>
> Regards,
> Keith
>
>

  reply	other threads:[~2017-03-12  3:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-11  3:35 Kai Zhang
2017-03-11 14:52 ` Wiles, Keith
2017-03-11 15:45   ` Kai Zhang
2017-03-11 18:59     ` Wiles, Keith
2017-03-12  3:21       ` Kai Zhang [this message]
2017-03-12  3:29         ` Kai Zhang
2017-03-12 10:32           ` Wiles, Keith
2017-03-12 10:39             ` Kai Zhang
2017-03-12 18:55               ` Wiles, Keith
2017-03-12 19:24               ` Wiles, Keith
2017-03-12 23:44                 ` Kai Zhang
2017-03-13  9:58                   ` Van Haaren, Harry
2017-03-13 10:59                     ` Kai Zhang
2017-03-15 14:56 David Coen
2017-03-15 15:48 David Coen
2017-03-15 17:02 ` Kai Zhang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CACKSPmcby5CQxUcQ4KMSpRQM5Y-+be2aP+jGK6Tnyue2r6cueA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=kay21s@gmail.com \
    --cc=keith.wiles@intel.com \
    --cc=users@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).