From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <users-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7912A2EEB
	for <public@inbox.dpdk.org>; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 08:28:34 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E0701F06D;
	Fri, 13 Sep 2019 08:28:34 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail-vs1-f68.google.com (mail-vs1-f68.google.com
 [209.85.217.68]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DB411F032
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 08:28:33 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-vs1-f68.google.com with SMTP id m22so17873612vsl.9
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 23:28:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
 h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=YV+sRIp1Bm98vWN7BmIA14xM/IN1qiZMD96wHAf1yJA=;
 b=WXutQccfKTHH+g46yOAzCJDFDfKlve1i5kYlDG6o6QhScewYgpuVWmU8+HK2POmGUu
 pQAJgToLWY5LWHbpYx9DtA6bBy3XkTPUBDijfnjWAsfPyeAULWjcQULUg+c2sZn6xarO
 bIJOQ9INPzeFx3ZQGnW6ivY7JRdFnLqyRAli7HdSUuBNzHztFhAbwWddsbBgvDLUo//h
 HxDpEga2XusI9CKhJT+9/m+BhmxYma/gfpTxEjP0lrc/dju0QFqOGbHdQmQLm+HsK7KQ
 5Dpe+RHXo09dVdZ3M2jY2sc5BbzHzAhAWI2oz0tLE1OZq5G3kt9RrneP4JDxU2NIvUK6
 pJRA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=YV+sRIp1Bm98vWN7BmIA14xM/IN1qiZMD96wHAf1yJA=;
 b=NnnoC/HMrZxsFRExzHy/ltAgzirPcHYQFc/1M/ffb9h0LVYIfFOKV7oWGgtfSPLlsP
 927KmTdL07sYXgp1moHW8SzNIWilkOMXzWjRR0BOSpP0V8ml+y6ZhSHJOze4e9u8SAvb
 LFNTW82LgnD8NFSi+HeX6Zyi7/HSNIXhPrIbk55KX7FIL+eDXJL7ek9ao0ZbbLDEQZMM
 h0ZhUe9iEtoWf8phqVgLyRpoMLupnakXkfK+oI7NeFh5ls+EtP2XDJJAwwSrGaiC4fim
 V45djT+BxEv/MI4QRehtUZIkdxBVQlpP1N2+i5cwagdCuh96wDf+T2MNY5IOiT3Gzkqj
 bcSg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVwC9EwGEEG3JL13Q1WaMWuYf2kCB7EfxbaCvnqw2xY/xwDY5IH
 uY0xgEq34X6ix61D0ChKsEAm8Z2mC0V6udmwSkQTYh++
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzjRvmxIMpvqjqlFN2idqgkqqUvW6GhqmHfalGkk7isCrQXBVGt+VEYxSeB0f0GUpNTOCYr2bbpBTmRlogCtD4=
X-Received: by 2002:a67:ed50:: with SMTP id m16mr6972197vsp.86.1568356112612; 
 Thu, 12 Sep 2019 23:28:32 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: ha Fa <haiderfayeq80@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2019 14:28:22 +0800
Message-ID: <CAD0xCDuaAFbC4SyziMmniefx+4ddiODy9S019aFM0HVunVAgnA@mail.gmail.com>
To: users@dpdk.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: [dpdk-users] problem in packgage of iperf3,
	And wish to use dpdk iperf3
X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK usage discussions <users.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/users/>
List-Post: <mailto:users@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: users-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "users" <users-bounces@dpdk.org>

hi all,
am phd student,
I had designed my hybrid sdn network,
the recent issue am facing is iperf3, its not work with in this environment.
I had recently read dpdk and find some argument needs in my work, due to
limitation in ryu controller.
my question is can dpdk be same as iperf3 tool to send a bandwidth size -b
7M from 10.1.1.2 as source host to destination host 10.6.1.2.

kindly any blugs or GitHub need to follow exactly.
thanks for your time