From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f52.google.com (mail-wm0-f52.google.com [74.125.82.52]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 182011B1B0 for ; Tue, 9 Jan 2018 13:53:27 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wm0-f52.google.com with SMTP id i186so3934317wmi.4 for ; Tue, 09 Jan 2018 04:53:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infinite-io.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=y9ww8stfsVzEPzB+pSVme6aaFPmFKPvU2h02l5ZpySY=; b=QjYNxDf1KylYWswuC0vDJ0taweE0ng5Q+w/z7aVix9v2S3WIbIUk75UWSoU2YW0R4X vN/b7xuRLohX0Y4MwQDbuL1v4rgromka8tBxRFTMLOyAH6wgmU2knma0mg8O1BGpabJX QZKjIzLJUWtw7XIWJtIBMBbJxhoq5V6B89mKtiMZFmCC/yPLRabSZQnhpEQhdBo6jX1R VthP/wmHhjAdn0iqrT7Cnp8+EDpuZ9rMN4ep6HBZu4e3I6VqcMS2i6uvGS0vTPR6jjrV 2CRwVL08nd85+PRcznqBoC7WpSFMEEqR5/0SezHXNHiQOa7mdxCkH2Op/BdsXvjTz/05 aBLw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=y9ww8stfsVzEPzB+pSVme6aaFPmFKPvU2h02l5ZpySY=; b=GzKkAOp+sXt6kg47IMfNIsXNBdtVw8xVUH0KAruPqCBWaE3eU7a0Xjg8Au5qH7625F P4a2FxmzW6leLkHnR41esB6gqnR2fFZVCdBI2ND1hx5i+nLi0X2L0WxaY96JjgH0fOtI BRcsmJ+1zMp1fUsXxRSeMIkhRAfi/PPEKaApyr1FKEs7khMVrRdLknj32Trs7btsIczK vRZWBMLAIWK4v05gFs447nYu11xKkf4QnK5xzS8t0CWkpysN/lFS6OU45bAaxzH5la9m DcT+ptr8ZAavEnYBL5ZPJaJwb/i3Y6H7Y1xk+RDTgnC+thrBqzEagPedl9YPtNzZcFxW TwLw== X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mIhT+7KYEfGW76cBh0wztyjYfJ3tJxovKRq/wjgsf+Tsyi+DV6j 1M00jvV3cLhQfVgVIQ8u9yaHhfzFTYojz07SCVIfDw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBoubJfWi3jg+G4dZpdutC+3wT/Ie+Mpv3WB8XirWiqYhjKcNGBuwA02M8l5R6woeXPA2FBzOktqch1vdL5/PZyc= X-Received: by 10.28.22.67 with SMTP id 64mr11727805wmw.28.1515502407527; Tue, 09 Jan 2018 04:53:27 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.197.72 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Jan 2018 04:53:27 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Jay Rolette Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2018 06:53:27 -0600 Message-ID: To: Jason Preston , Luca Boccassi , Yuanhan Liu , Thomas Monjalon Cc: users Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] Relationship between dpdk and dpdk-stable repos X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2018 12:53:28 -0000 Thomas, Yuanhan or Luca, any insights you could provide here? On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 10:00 AM, Jason Preston wrote= : > Can someone explain the reason for having a separate dpdk and dpdk-stable > repo? The dpdk repo has a tag for the 16.11, but patches for that LTS > release (16.11.1, etc) are only in dpdk-stable? Is 17.11 still meant to = be > the latest LTS release? Why is it not in dpdk-stable? I=E2=80=99m tryin= g to > determine where is the best place for me to pull from.