From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <mlbown92@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-ua0-f178.google.com (mail-ua0-f178.google.com
 [209.85.217.178]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21AC237AA
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 15:01:17 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-ua0-f178.google.com with SMTP id 40so13141173uau.2
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 06:01:17 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
 h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=4m7Y/E4TR3xhYfcTsy3Y/3N/W+Z8GjMAAyAB/S7p0A8=;
 b=YiA6qyM9E8WLtQ9CkJgUSqP9PWFgwCi2ZlWD7/0tCCiMz+C+97aIMFx1l2xH0yAF/2
 /u8DXhOwCA0XeB5wZjjYq0ijXsx4sLWVMTCRINfeJys0orFM+T8BNyIzC6thNGtqveDc
 FK2bVGoxsFt5Gu2zUCXLUH8doR46qCQKYzF5b4YNxuCWaRntLKul2IH9JzPG/en994fa
 6BDBWsCu+Oow0j2yZefKRWKOcyxVSiBjynd29hHxKjDqK5b/DNd+ndIgdYWfuK8iAw7i
 EjMu9jTqfovOV7pmcIB3j6KgtG3XTeSXF7FNeU0g5s4c5TegwVgLYiUSxK3ElFLDsmKE
 MrUg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=4m7Y/E4TR3xhYfcTsy3Y/3N/W+Z8GjMAAyAB/S7p0A8=;
 b=hicwG4EmpaZWtbecZhkB4g/CrJgCye5gU2vAvkaAZhZ1vsyw1s1wEAyIGiFhDjI2Vj
 UHQVdeJm9YHdxnYDjWcjab8vrh+5pz0oPwfM8bH4s332OquhW0O3jsIgo7q/aKOZ2kzq
 /hMf9ljyoVnq5H4kxG9lj/dlMe/kShCCOfy3Hhe+LwW17X/4Mf0uCBbhMgBQXPBKa3nN
 Uyluoeb8dT0s+df3aTr6enixU7PfVvF5KCSJ83uFMadl7XfG/EXtsmRXMMIZLg7tU4os
 fXQ8eStozRwMDWwEWlJEsOvdr2Z2rkOUFlZuEAOGi+9cPazfDHlIfH2q5DC3je+/KZEO
 EZvQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39lVViZdU2OoojnqY45gUztGP9X1Rsn5puFnWIOTtoOekR9GfCPxyP81hJ0AAgoqT1gGPb2emp5D+6TO1Q==
X-Received: by 10.176.17.9 with SMTP id e9mr931925uab.172.1487944876448; Fri,
 24 Feb 2017 06:01:16 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.176.81.1 with HTTP; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 06:00:36 -0800 (PST)
From: Matthew Bown <mlbown92@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 14:00:36 +0000
Message-ID: <CADSWrzQUvjyuwSh08fdNRFnVsmendd3L_ahUWaeXML2xy_=7eQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: users@dpdk.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: [dpdk-users] Get SFP module EEPROM from dpdk
X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK usage discussions <users.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/users/>
List-Post: <mailto:users@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 14:01:17 -0000

Hi,

I'm trying to get the EEPROM info from the SFP+ plugged into my intel
82599.

I've looked at the ethtool example application, however that appears to
only work when the port is owned by linux. In my application the port
belongs to dpdk.

I tried this command: rte_eth_dev_get_eeprom

This contains 16k bytes, and none of it looks like the module EEPROM . I
think this is the controller's EEPROM.

Is it possible to access the module EEPROM whilst the port is under dpdk?

Thanks,

Matthew