From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <users-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33C7CA0565
	for <public@inbox.dpdk.org>; Mon,  2 Mar 2020 08:17:50 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB10E1BFF2;
	Mon,  2 Mar 2020 08:17:49 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mail-yw1-f46.google.com (mail-yw1-f46.google.com
 [209.85.161.46]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9DC11BFF2
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Mon,  2 Mar 2020 08:17:48 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-yw1-f46.google.com with SMTP id y72so10351152ywg.3
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Sun, 01 Mar 2020 23:17:48 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
 h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=8PkStduzTDIa4UGgFAcvXQTdK5DlfA9dzU25icAwsgU=;
 b=B8R2D5+OZEKA9sdly2iFmJHG9D0FGD8yn6HGely7NNDzrpIKHL/Y0Qvp5Sl3tMUpkS
 /GM5w/6JlAJFZM0lI6fW/Bd+CnCsMO5Y7wu/YgsCoABhXXoITTXdODENmC2MyarXmf+I
 UOjwjYrVZRU0pSB3vnu2zNrzcR8hTDU+/n86zTQnSAaNrYn8NYlv5DKzx+xZvnyJbzuy
 SNdiwNNbxgqdJX7N3IHQSv/68ZorMrCXCU0hm8jgNWH5V7KOVpLlHlIkctUng02AcQJD
 B+m3vEi3mGJrZFZBITOmKWw6b4hdRSHEylilw+KkDIfdtOXtvW349HHjt/Y8xOYwT//o
 0kug==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=8PkStduzTDIa4UGgFAcvXQTdK5DlfA9dzU25icAwsgU=;
 b=nsny22A0bMPp47ooqybi3ygTi8KbphtuVYq9ojj/Ndi4KiONwOvbOPjoGK2M9ssoib
 MuSeE70WJYTwsOlZ32J+pcngu8cBNNuJZkjP5zq/zDlLDZFmnBfZf/3NWIAwlBmpX+xQ
 pKCLg2Y/9GzK+wS8U1WUgvl+Ua4ZX5YMKCN2diHi2vgKCskxnjm5Pm1WL7vbHi+4Dhit
 apY6fYV8+dQsh2ilDMrqzAycNiZIX5Fyl5ezTWLS6oUIrceKX64l76S/Lf45xjZJAh7q
 XavzkB/goPCtan+5Dn/4BzDJX4lnc7rCvFBzFy2g8Ms/2SjaDE82q5afjpeoQTsl0+I+
 XsfQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ04qydjGQHkavd/gvwTXXpY3wg5WeHlRG3p6aPSrIrQvx8t+cbz
 BsLfvcjjmr116MlXPEG3SZR3y4GeDgYD10mO57lyQg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vtv9mQsAw17cURnzSy95FORA/96qUqOef6DLg7k95QXLFS0zAiR7XonaODn0Btzb6Q8fr3ZwP1p+IfnuhEb7K8=
X-Received: by 2002:a25:2c1:: with SMTP id 184mr7463471ybc.281.1583133467782; 
 Sun, 01 Mar 2020 23:17:47 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: JeongHwan Kim <kjh.kernel.kr@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2020 16:17:37 +0900
Message-ID: <CAE-TMpCZw-55A3ifzSDNN5Vcr=qBgwtXM3E6cGVek320KA9MXw@mail.gmail.com>
To: users@dpdk.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: [dpdk-users] thread safty of crypto equeue/dequeue process
X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK usage discussions <users.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/users/>
List-Post: <mailto:users@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: users-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "users" <users-bounces@dpdk.org>

Hi, everyone

I wonder if the crypto enqueue/dequeue process is thread-safe?
Can several threads in a core call the enqueue/dequeue function of crypto
PMD simultaneously?
I hope your answer.

Thanks in avance.
J.Hwan Kim