From: Yuliang Li <yuliang.li@yale.edu>
To: users@dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-users] difference between rte_eth_tx_buffer and rte_eth_tx_burst
Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2017 20:46:23 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAECc8jop=DtPm8WbAsgEA2J34rxPSCXWzCoWk9ASznRoG55iQA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
Hi all,
I am new to DPDK. I found 2 functions that can send packets:
rte_eth_tx_buffer and rte_eth_tx_burst. I am confused about why we need
these two different functions. To me, I can use only rte_eth_tx_burst, and
rte_eth_tx_buffer does add more functional capability. Are there any other
concerns like performance or others that we need these two functions?
Thanks,
--
Yuliang Li
PhD student
Department of Computer Science
Yale University
next reply other threads:[~2017-03-05 1:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-05 1:46 Yuliang Li [this message]
2017-03-05 15:22 ` Wiles, Keith
2017-03-05 17:26 ` Yuliang Li
2017-03-06 9:17 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAECc8jop=DtPm8WbAsgEA2J34rxPSCXWzCoWk9ASznRoG55iQA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=yuliang.li@yale.edu \
--cc=users@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).