From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0988A034C for ; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 12:38:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 897801C065; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 12:38:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-ej1-f41.google.com (mail-ej1-f41.google.com [209.85.218.41]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58F432BE2; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 12:38:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-ej1-f41.google.com with SMTP id m22so21436621eje.10; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 03:38:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=a/mhNgPrr2767PIamr76+tbUaoGkCDsEKj+vsvTjeQY=; b=NnkCNiIjPWb87m0U6Mt5kAfC3qMWZW46mZsPbTVsRMdqkp1Bkk/DidAD54HYB0tIJ8 +4FvGzGUAXbY66Ciy+T27jcMxnCiADcj0Uv5kewrpAOgGEAT/ZkbqOb6cjRK3LiqGsjU PkRlIixQfXmgtl8r2kAFVmmnnOpEvbq69RCSTmJSB2FqZ0Rd7q92wcYlFcfmyd6hK1bf Qs8fdE3hkQhc/DTJLEweRVvSD45clbWag9G4X5IRsFS55a6/3K4SVvE6YAP9g5TdgxBC Ow/p3y9U2HwGTPnGrPzZ1yCnQ7tkbS1wTwRTNHiw4SEie4SEfibWSNOBbQ4NqJWMEzqv Zr9g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=a/mhNgPrr2767PIamr76+tbUaoGkCDsEKj+vsvTjeQY=; b=qzK0DvG3iI5Wdq+9AnWZ2wRXp+o7Ei8/OKyvbAAVnPcs8Hffi0Ag+VmxNV2EBVtAUV xO5Lt7Kwe4Qir9o65GwGGv3nkH597RutXREzmabrZjAf1MG3b++lF/zJFwLi7V2G2P/6 6Q8tVxvRdF+ta9z2Aiqvm1+y+Qeg4W5XCH+51hUBrkHr/n6wOkewiV5EKwqT2RGqHwwK b7yY/YGeM79C9G57jr2T5ec4K0U6hbky5awpDsCiVF5lppyEoK1+iA9AK6Nb/TcKmzWb dGGWBbO03hRjCP5lL+/n2enwyin3pjg42uiPtv4455yNrCFNF1IJN5EFUUZ+96FMZh9t YHpQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532uI8mXDEKJi6P1TPtxHVRaVWGAM8j8WDN9ML4ue4zq7mi1L45H vHaKHrbeZEWu/L2lIqArl2XImAY3HQiikDuuuSJ1T2VE X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxeBl8FM4G679BKk4UNTQ2LXLyec7bfJFlY3JFWu2XlQB8vt3d2T6q98r0setMoi1PSJpqanufQ3cxP3pepMLU= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:ce37:: with SMTP id sd23mr20224393ejb.272.1597747092843; Tue, 18 Aug 2020 03:38:12 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: satyavalli rama Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 16:07:59 +0530 Message-ID: To: dev@dpdk.org, users@dpdk.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] Ipsec-secgw packet processing X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: users-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "users" We further debugged and we observed that while running ipsec-secgw application in transport-mode dpdk-19.02/11, we found that inline packet processing is not happening. We observed that ol_flags is not setting from driver level. We are expecting that , because of ol_flags not set , inline packet processing is not happening.Any idea What could be the reason for this, I think ol_flags will be configured from driver level Or else do we need to provide any external configuration for setting ol_flags. And also we are not observing encrypt/decrypt packets on pdump before sending packets out from tx-port(rte_eth_tx_burst()). Please help us on this...to proceed further. Thanks & Regards Satya On Mon, 17 Aug, 2020, 4:11 pm satyavalli rama, wrote: > > Hello, > > While we are running ipsec-secgw application in transport-mode on > dpdk-19.02, we found that inline packet processing is not happening. > > And also we are not observing any encrypt/decrypt packets on pdump before > sending packets out from tx-port(rte_eth_tx_burst()). > > Please help us on how to proceed further. > > Thanks, > Jagadeesh > >