From: satyavalli rama <satyavalli.rama@gmail.com>
To: Anoob Joseph <anoobj@marvell.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, users@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] [dpdk-dev] Ipsec-secgw packet processing
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 16:53:32 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAECt3bODT+5easFPBsjrqU3a2gv25n6zvsAEY_7bOpPr83K5gA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAECt3bM6KV5u-9_NKno5sXdVw1zgF_UyUVWk34rPwzceVhVYKw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Anoob,
Do you need any more info.. Kindly help us.. We are totally stuck..
Thanks
On Wed, 19 Aug, 2020, 4:38 pm satyavalli rama, <satyavalli.rama@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi Anoob
>
> We are using the following hardware details,
> HOST: x722 (i40e) intel.
> VM: e1000 (82540) intel.
>
> We have launched Virtual machine on host , and executing ipsec-secgw
> application on VM.
>
> Please find below the CLI and configuration for TRANSPORT MODE.
>
> CLI:
>
> ./build/ipsec-secgw -l 0 -n 4 --socket-mem 1024,0 --vdev "crypto_null" --
> -p 0x3 -P -u 0x1 --config="(0,0,0),(1,0,0)" -f ep0.cfg
>
> #TRANSPORT:
>
> #SP IPv4 rules
> sp ipv4 out esp protect 10 pri 1 dst 192.168.122.0/24 sport 0:65535 dport
> 0:65535
>
> #SA rules
> sa out 10 cipher_algo aes-128-cbc cipher_key
> a1:a1:a1:a1:a1:a1:a1:a1:a1:a1:a1:\
> a1:a1:a1:a1:a1 auth_algo sha1-hmac auth_key
> a1:a1:a1:a1:a1:a1:a1:a1:a1:a1:a1:\
> a1:a1:a1:a1:a1:a1:a1:a1:a1 mode transport
>
> #Routing rules
> rt ipv4 dst 192.168.122.0/24 port 1
>
>
> Please find below the CLI and configuration for TUNNEL MODE.
>
> CLI:
>
> ./build/ipsec-secgw -l 0 -n 4 --socket-mem 1024,0 --vdev "crypto_null" --
> -p 0x3 -P -u 0x1 --config="(0,0,0),(1,0,0)" -f ep0.cfg
>
> #TUNNEL End Point-0:
>
> #SP IPv4 rules
> sp ipv4 out esp protect 5 pri 1 dst 192.168.122.0/24 sport 0:65535 dport
> 0:65535
>
> #SA rules
> sa out 5 cipher_algo aes-128-cbc cipher_key
> 0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0 \
> auth_algo sha1-hmac auth_key 0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0:0 \
> mode ipv4-tunnel src 192.168.122.96 dst 192.168.122.213
>
> #Routing rules
> rt ipv4 dst 192.168.122.0/24 port 1
>
> On Tue, 18 Aug, 2020, 4:29 pm Anoob Joseph, <anoobj@marvell.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Satya,
>>
>> Are you attempting to enable inline protocol (IPsec) functionality? If
>> yes, which PMD (& h/w) are you using for the same?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Anoob
>>
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: dev <dev-bounces@dpdk.org> On Behalf Of satyavalli rama
>> > Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2020 4:08 PM
>> > To: dev@dpdk.org; users@dpdk.org
>> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Ipsec-secgw packet processing
>> >
>> > We further debugged and we observed that while running ipsec-secgw
>> > application in transport-mode dpdk-19.02/11, we found that inline packet
>> > processing is not happening.
>> > We observed that ol_flags is not setting from driver level. We are
>> expecting
>> > that , because of ol_flags not set , inline packet processing is not
>> > happening.Any idea What could be the reason for this, I think ol_flags
>> will be
>> > configured from driver level Or else do we need to provide any external
>> > configuration for setting ol_flags.
>> > And also we are not observing encrypt/decrypt packets on pdump before
>> > sending packets out from tx-port(rte_eth_tx_burst()).
>> > Please help us on this...to proceed further.
>> >
>> > Thanks & Regards
>> > Satya
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, 17 Aug, 2020, 4:11 pm satyavalli rama, <
>> satyavalli.rama@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > >
>> > > Hello,
>> > >
>> > > While we are running ipsec-secgw application in transport-mode on
>> > > dpdk-19.02, we found that inline packet processing is not happening.
>> > >
>> > > And also we are not observing any encrypt/decrypt packets on pdump
>> > > before sending packets out from tx-port(rte_eth_tx_burst()).
>> > >
>> > > Please help us on how to proceed further.
>> > >
>> > > Thanks,
>> > > Jagadeesh
>> > >
>> > >
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-26 11:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-04 7:24 [dpdk-users] l2fwd application are not sending continuous packets Rohit kamble
[not found] ` <CAMJ3rejbOZ5mzOYyNPFqVk-Scs7CTaVZLUQOd-GMnVpaYf+pmg@mail.gmail.com>
2020-01-06 5:55 ` [dpdk-users] Fwd: " satyavalli rama
2020-01-06 7:07 ` [dpdk-users] " satyavalli rama
2020-01-09 1:55 ` satyavalli rama
2020-01-09 6:12 ` [dpdk-users] [dpdk-dev] " Stephen Hemminger
2020-01-09 10:34 ` satyavalli rama
2020-08-17 10:41 ` [dpdk-users] Ipsec-secgw packet processing satyavalli rama
2020-08-18 10:37 ` satyavalli rama
2020-08-18 10:59 ` [dpdk-users] [dpdk-dev] " Anoob Joseph
2020-08-19 11:08 ` satyavalli rama
2020-08-26 11:23 ` satyavalli rama [this message]
2020-08-31 5:17 ` [dpdk-users] [EXT] " Anoob Joseph
2020-08-31 12:47 ` Pathak, Pravin
2020-09-01 11:07 ` [dpdk-users] [dpdk-dev] [EXT] " Iremonger, Bernard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAECt3bODT+5easFPBsjrqU3a2gv25n6zvsAEY_7bOpPr83K5gA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=satyavalli.rama@gmail.com \
--cc=anoobj@marvell.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=users@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).