From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-oi0-f54.google.com (mail-oi0-f54.google.com [209.85.218.54]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A82E2A5D for ; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 07:48:52 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-oi0-f54.google.com with SMTP id y198so9076389oia.1 for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 22:48:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=KC04DXoBxAZtzI5E7S6MhjqvKsf+UnJEEDVjMseB15A=; b=LznfFiIdXmsdK3T+B6mlmYUPsYHRDsiw0pa7VMgTqfuZ78xJLK6jw4evHL3LlBXpNQ V73zznYcHmGIBjdfSC1x/ti5/+gTeUlCaVA7SDWPcu4c8OjGiR9d7sTL3nrYesezFfw/ nxBFtwUW5Kx25RrDXhEUDti4srxy1A1vzFdg3phqKGWY6Gp5o9fcJ8VhfFT74MoyrPMs f4ZK/H+HDgaaC9+RcOTEYAA0CBsDEGK59OyK1RBxD8tL2UoWDGeKBMyRDfZFCzmkynLl zfx4N3IcJRJm4BszI/BbDWOs9xesZGwZ1UvcFwXUeZnR2PngiskxYY18TbnUAfCi6Th5 2yOw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=KC04DXoBxAZtzI5E7S6MhjqvKsf+UnJEEDVjMseB15A=; b=TD9gc7RQO8X3OqNqBy2zLzYEZ706Lmdm7Aaisk1BFMR3jhN6TvVwbxya/sO2FnhPaP OPdaZV75Kw7LAZiiNAqddYAYI60ELULj6pO4fysAUM2ok+IJQoBKndFr2JtKnDZ3a0BC wH0YoMcW5G5RVnPkxZGs8huSuYXlnK+EpWDMhs4fAHeoGzPsOmpdBmOP9AQlsSI+R+XL fTIfZojh68iBvA2oVO8A4nXWy/E1vCjRl8WZec1qlCnbWi6pYRFDCtc13Yi2/UfswtyY jl7H++oklVC4Qza9SeNNhwH/QUweUhqhgubXXGChhLiaVvtwskwODIIiN5U3LxgMvUBU qg2A== X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC03yhoruealGX71NeBRjaFMub6Y/3oO6SWkrD/WCbACUEbaI0oVkuxidLc0Ed6VgG2AM4wWBiyxlLsTLVw== X-Received: by 10.157.40.151 with SMTP id s23mr11628441ota.68.1479797331605; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 22:48:51 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.202.172.134 with HTTP; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 22:48:51 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Anupam Kapoor Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 12:18:51 +0530 Message-ID: To: =?UTF-8?Q?Norbert_Nyak=C3=B3?= Cc: users@dpdk.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] Dell PowerEdge CPU IERR caused by DPDK 16.07 X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 06:48:52 -0000 On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 3:45 PM, Norbert Nyak=C3=B3 wrote: > As soon as I ran the testpipeline sample application on one of the > servers it stops responding and on the LCD info screen and in the > logs CPU IERR error messages appear > =E2=80=8Bdifficult to *conclusively* conclude =E2=80=8Bthat this might be _= caused_ by dpdk. what is the error that you see (not just the fact that you saw a CPU-IERR) ? for some more information have a look here: http://www.dell.com/support/article/in/en/indhs1/SLN292634. maybe reseating memory modules (or some such) on the machine where you see this might fix the issue ? one laborious but possible approach to conclude that this is caused (rather than just _triggered_) by dpdk would be to invert machine configuration and then retest ? =E2=80=8B-- thanks anupam =E2=80=8B In the beginning was the lambda, and the lambda was with Emacs, and Emacs was the lambda.