From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-it0-f54.google.com (mail-it0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 637E09E7 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 05:14:44 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-it0-f54.google.com with SMTP id u205so12804971itc.0 for ; Wed, 09 Nov 2016 20:14:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Y2X2w0ix+QcJEZXSVuhH4NzjaGXuGSr1VvL86Opz1Mc=; b=ieShEmxu6IonRbYBA0rKw9SHqIuisT9DB06YGm8AFFZrQjuTKDmfbD/lgHmY5HeL69 gL5wCk9RdctbCCXEl9iG0NUusC93QZWaJZgLBlzXw6YEdKCKxUKLaXxY7iKzhWWvO7wm S6Z6VYm845ZXTCsaQDtVqN1cMx28hM+vOFNv3LWrFdCXcNkiAui6DbhU9hJ1ElBibzO2 vjBiBhpc3YEPaYT1JfE+2/4yCvb2owt4nqIMgw1XYEGECp5JKcJlKeSAQDaktpizdapj jh59g6WDKmaFdtRvbIb4uhvobatlV8T5tUFgiqZoQMShDL6dVFn7QVHBVrtsobH2/zc6 QCiA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Y2X2w0ix+QcJEZXSVuhH4NzjaGXuGSr1VvL86Opz1Mc=; b=R/qxxPerffudlsEh736w8y90q0QFh/IqHiPYJWiQ6xwFA43BSW634FqBtoMIKqK9Se JPA5ws55d3NsjGYicRxTBAm4FxlkjIzOGw0u/4LAUuNCjuJaU+CsnYiWbABHDWSzFjT9 JMlA5CnqUJObx8Xf9HBdA8UNQITcAuYPZdEqOJ+J+rAH20A4pM8h+VZHWcrOuPy68ode PapI7ppm5+1gJs7eN++o2KRUJ2fmopeSG0f2f059k++qndctHsSQfDV1SRbbIy1/7/FF 0zOXImGx7DdnCVS2WWt3sN0inhe5Ly0SRtOfck0tOLbg+UFtWiNaLBda4wHx8V2aJEFb LNUA== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvfCe60qbkkemTfOdZjSwFq9Ahj+5wgm3bOGeLNaIzswWSMOsGfdlVHYpoTI8Kv89IN9tlwCl/8p4zldfA== X-Received: by 10.202.94.6 with SMTP id s6mr1777964oib.134.1478751283683; Wed, 09 Nov 2016 20:14:43 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.202.87.74 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Nov 2016 20:14:43 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <84125BAD-BA31-4E28-8FF6-F7D4D5BD1EE3@akamai.com> <04379c033c964c889dddd2b9918a500b@EUX13SRV1.EU.NEC.COM> From: Anupam Kapoor Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 09:44:43 +0530 Message-ID: To: "Wiles, Keith" Cc: David Aldrich , "Pavey, Nicholas" , "users@dpdk.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] Is DPDK compatible with C++11 threads? X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 04:14:44 -0000 On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 2:30 AM, Wiles, Keith wrote= : > Also look at one of the DPDK examples as it uses a lthread on top of > pthreads and it may give you some ideas as to how multiple threads can > work. I am trying to remember which example and my dev machine is down at > this time, but just search for lthread. =E2=80=8Bthis one: =E2=80=8Bhttp://dpdk.org/doc/guides/sample_app_ug/perfor= mance_thread.html one more thing that you probably need to watch out for would be libc interactions within your C++11 application e.g. usage of stl containers might exact a severe performance penalty... -- kind regards anupam In the beginning was the lambda, and the lambda was with Emacs, and Emacs was the lambda.