From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-oi0-f51.google.com (mail-oi0-f51.google.com [209.85.218.51]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B0C020F for ; Tue, 16 May 2017 18:30:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-oi0-f51.google.com with SMTP id b204so32222135oii.1 for ; Tue, 16 May 2017 09:30:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=hWPi9ml0LL7mz70x11axS5dPzejFpbFGm/Y8qKhRwjQ=; b=L7CCIvNuSfSbiUqNi4P0/28z0c4mRh3BOcbxfAFJTaGGtAHd8/t5DrT+Di3XW0T7z3 cMZHo8iCSQtFyNzN3ujeSzuvlo6FrUvKZFFld9BAQEDTYS5ca+7RPYK/ZWLbqmaYQ/BI 4NO9ynCESzN7DNwr8LczjKWEtNG3aomYXFYk7kHLJzxEc8S7akUHVd2DAHrtL3GvJHPB XfasBuLgXbxNkuG/cCHgPgLQ+I0KQxY3S3Did6m+DqazkoMumd3IGTXS7YWde6wkIvkS suWIgpBAdJspy75quzhfOr9trTJA7QDMyUph6tMeG/s0eZKht6y4pZ1kGl2ZdAzlF5WE Ai1Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=hWPi9ml0LL7mz70x11axS5dPzejFpbFGm/Y8qKhRwjQ=; b=lcfDcnVRl6kFZXRYlSixn0j2X+ZLPVxFB8ET6M37mm+CBw3G8pXsWqZbRcSy+/JyJG MGXAbRKM6MqMAEmu/DK2njZ6sCIiwphIqZNEdfUWFhwr+GMopIs+RY/EE0NeACzFeJ/V a22cHz8SqDq52k/Sng1ZHFNCk8E573Tb28wsPXhlRW1Ya/z/jg5kxrMrOPgv346gJPVW VB6lKtEHNreMgEtVmryguZhWrOb3k8e8O52d7YGHR/InPOBirPD/7bRtfSahoN7xAvqP c8vqqdu8ATj1zfjk1vThkkiaA/bPlwmQtmxSK/RjEKSpvKHR70uvG2AND6P/kW3HXcbv /cVg== X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcCWLUlFKUAUFN2nA4hANMOzJxlp85N9JUVRYKf7/3+Atf8Fml2m FiOJjT85jQ+usSPRZIs0/7CelDGSfvFV6Rw= X-Received: by 10.202.168.140 with SMTP id r134mr2092941oie.57.1494952228491; Tue, 16 May 2017 09:30:28 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.202.65.134 with HTTP; Tue, 16 May 2017 09:30:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Anupam Kapoor Date: Tue, 16 May 2017 22:00:27 +0530 Message-ID: To: Kumaraparameshwaran Rathnavel Cc: users@dpdk.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] Memory Allocation X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 May 2017 16:30:29 -0000 On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 9:44 PM, Kumaraparameshwaran Rathnavel < krath@cloudsimple.com> wrote: > will the memory be allocated on the Node where the DPDK thread was > initially running when the memory allocation functions was called =E2=80=8Brte_malloc=E2=80=8B(...) will return memory allocated on the NUMA = socket of the core which made the invokation. access to this from other locations will incur the qpi penalty... =E2=80=8B-- thanks anupam=E2=80=8B In the beginning was the lambda, and the lambda was with Emacs, and Emacs was the lambda.