From: Sudharshan Krishnakumar <sudhar.ckrishna@gmail.com>
To: users@dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-users] access to different ports on the same NIC by 2 DPDK applications
Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 13:34:35 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAEm3rU=P9r4U6ZK+y60CUh9-dVoVPvjgQ5-a1Euq83Ftbh7_Qw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
Hi All,
Have a Qs related to-> access to different ports on the same NIC by 2 DPDK
applications.
Setup: 4-Port 10 Gig NIC card with ports bound for DPDK usage.
With intel’s igb_uio kernel driver (used for binding NIC’s ports) using
dpdk-setup.sh, at the /dev level, I see 4 device paths created,
/dev/uio0, /dev/uio1, /dev/ui02, /dev/uio3
And I was able to run 2 DPDK applications concurrently(by blacklisting the
ports in EAL parameters), and they were able to take ownership of different
ports on the same NIC.
For example DPDK_APP1 can take access of ports->0,1 and DPDK_APP2 can take
access of ports->2,3.
Currently, I am using another DPDK app that relies on binding to VFIO
driver.
So I am trying to switch to binding NIC’s 4 ports to VFIO driver.
Enabled VTIO in BIOS and added intel_iommu=on in kernel boot-param in GRUB.
After binding all 4 ports to VFIO driver, using dpdk-setup,sh, at the /dev
level, I only see these 2 device paths created-> /dev/vfio/vfio(control
channel)
and /dev/vfio/1(essentially just 1 path).
I am able to run one DPDK application, for example-> PacketGen tool.
But not able to run 2 DPDK applications concurrently accessing different
ports on the same NIC, due to DPDK application not being able to get access
to the ports.
For example, if I launch DPDK_APP1 first, it can get access to the ports,
but DPDK_APP2 is NOT able to get access, and vice-versa.
Note that both apps are trying to access different ports on the same NIC,
and also ports have been black-listed as part of EAL params to the DPDK
apps.
I know this is possible with igb_uio driver.
Please let me know, if it is possible to do this when ports are bound to
VFIO driver.
Thanks,
Sudha
next reply other threads:[~2021-05-20 20:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-20 20:34 Sudharshan Krishnakumar [this message]
2021-05-20 20:54 ` Stephen Hemminger
2021-05-20 21:19 ` Sudharshan Krishnakumar
2021-05-20 22:34 ` Stephen Hemminger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAEm3rU=P9r4U6ZK+y60CUh9-dVoVPvjgQ5-a1Euq83Ftbh7_Qw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=sudhar.ckrishna@gmail.com \
--cc=users@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).