From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <users-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9817A0613
	for <public@inbox.dpdk.org>; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 06:54:29 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B310937B4;
	Tue, 24 Sep 2019 06:54:29 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail-ot1-f49.google.com (mail-ot1-f49.google.com
 [209.85.210.49]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 057FC2C23
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Tue, 24 Sep 2019 06:54:29 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-ot1-f49.google.com with SMTP id o44so323371ota.10
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 21:54:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
 h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=QSdv03h+wK1CA8B2a3vkOcEYGX4wcDYZBGcUjyVg8pQ=;
 b=dcMCQW97Njhgyl87LAw6aCOuP77sclhF4pnACKguPDXEInIkHe3KrVYIZiqyiTT1T9
 WYUkWDnz5pCxRe4WB/ts08xHfdcg/Ngkeus5GJAGB9kIMuE2FJTdQiJIw5oE0NhSNRsT
 G28qRGuyB+vsRE60+6buWTYvDnPD1aF/4pCdXcsHLYdREPVW6tefB38pJsoiabtqWdcr
 gldyEjZHdzUFES+7Iyd5ZHInFYP6R1JItXE0xxu03Vxp4/OPlJp1chm6r7ZjcGo4QwmV
 3NRzfLpAccnGell87YPxPdhzA8PCaDBeOopzTkU3yRFll+U8Mvfr4pABwodUUkxPdqM1
 2TZA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=QSdv03h+wK1CA8B2a3vkOcEYGX4wcDYZBGcUjyVg8pQ=;
 b=bYx0v67KDTNpT5CpfoeprlumrcATjdpS/LaP2JpnlbV1WJ03Hrtql2Qhp7j3mcQmzn
 tDvJGXudLFJzilDTSRA8+3p2XHim8wQAhuH8pxWEMrC5KkjvsaGeNU0/9FyQCKDvFidn
 CVQArRdHUHCP2ceYlld+OjMf7PAp0StI24zNMIrgeFI+j8ac4z0I8rSYKm1woAq32DZH
 XmFEXxG3eqj8WZtQdcYN2LvaUkOJ5UAO91yLKJOsmrTsF0okGfKfLw4xe2dtV/QyCtdh
 1WYMi385yAErAZ0ZMjQ8MQaZi3q1th94lSfYODBW6SYY2y15Y9wc/mvqRlAYmh1RQ1xo
 y/Lw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUOPbZbVzgl61+ixym1R8SXEM6u9pQHGEqJuhewsVJWXQSBzOtl
 ichHmjWlzKsvrMJO2YvukcPr+w+kXtxeb15xiH9B3J8Ukds=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwXVu1MeV9yTf6VheNxLYfeqc8SCim0bVHaIaTs53z/XOiKHcM7HyIsEiFbQyIxsxFC2Nft9dPIkqTr9Abkp0o=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:5cc9:: with SMTP id r9mr398101oti.99.1569300867979;
 Mon, 23 Sep 2019 21:54:27 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Derek <jwsu1986@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 12:54:17 +0800
Message-ID: <CAFKS8hU5yGy1Po1std1hSntJEhmkUfQdesnQ+Bpw-bfKJ5zq=g@mail.gmail.com>
To: users@dpdk.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: [dpdk-users] Failure of scp by vm2vm using vhost-switch example
X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK usage discussions <users.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/users/>
List-Post: <mailto:users@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: users-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "users" <users-bounces@dpdk.org>

Hi, guys

I tried to setup and vm2vm experiment based on the "test case 2" in this
Intel report (
http://fast.dpdk.org/doc/perf/DPDK_19_05_Intel_virtio_performance_report.pdf
).

The tx/rx performance can be measured by iperf tool expectly.

The, I try to do the "scp" from vm1 to vm2.
When I scp one 32KB or 64KB file from vm1 to vm2, it works.
However, when scp 10MB file, it failed and got the "packet_write_wait:
connection to 1.1.1.8 port 22: Broken pipe".

Any clue for the this failure?

Many thanks.
Derek