From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7BC9A0518 for ; Sun, 2 Aug 2020 18:53:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C896D1C022; Sun, 2 Aug 2020 18:53:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-wr1-f53.google.com (mail-wr1-f53.google.com [209.85.221.53]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB94F2E8F for ; Sun, 2 Aug 2020 18:53:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wr1-f53.google.com with SMTP id a14so32104428wra.5 for ; Sun, 02 Aug 2020 09:53:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=netgate.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=rEDle2CdAD0f/KdZme4sg4kMpohiih7K8Pjo6p5Rg+o=; b=JlwQ1mSNweLZz2CzsUgCwssnU+1zmtYBuyea4FUYW4Se6Ezu8kOaffvFt+xqXXXXt1 aMUpvj6J0awwhEemTYPHWX9IYFmH2yLcC3I0FVBZtScorBi37ZQKzH3Ksw/F9p+KuFLh Kc6n7hAIQgOz//d9mu8qRhesNgmXwVoRklxfw= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=rEDle2CdAD0f/KdZme4sg4kMpohiih7K8Pjo6p5Rg+o=; b=fAzBPx2xY+TKjmtDdM6vTrIte/ApxhojFnGPX5IKv1YuivvipGNbsWQmXmIrCaF9Dx IQuqb6FKGVK87/RPqbUna8SmOknXJO97yliAvnCbZKQAJUEHZhLARKivIA5CygMX8ztg gybTkF3o4Wvk1lKnlAHefyfGgdKGA1cr553wpBCvGA/qW0Ky6b59KF9RN+4WRmZW5BC4 WAcgXaJMXEd3aDqHiGEej1sBcBRpg5mC3d5/P+b261v+ytGbKU2FlUISScH5MKhekCys VOkvrjCuNfcOXRT1s9PuVO20BmyMZzHXoUHAmN+OjL54n+d8GXGZHZwIVwgFfXXdXf80 Evcw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533ufRr5nXr5h4HXtfUBcaPhLhE1BEqAoOmcOh/Gynqc52FETLQI rJrDPDDwwdeSJEq1UhJwvMUKScoo06ZQgnGP11CHhg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwLZucPK+NaFK9u0UP+ET7BSCR4xxYYwdfWg1V5NoJYt2rjWcYw8YBvh6TcTWAhEzXVNUGZvH1NyVFQQKJGsqc= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:c:: with SMTP id h12mr11272233wrx.49.1596387232468; Sun, 02 Aug 2020 09:53:52 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200729120714.67bb46de@hermes.lan> In-Reply-To: From: Jon Loeliger Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2020 11:53:39 -0500 Message-ID: To: Archit Pandey Cc: Stephen Hemminger , dev@dpdk.org, users@dpdk.org, Gokul Bargaje , "Mohit P. Tahiliani" , Tarun Anand , Sanjana Krishnam , "Avinash ." , Leslie Monis Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] [dpdk-dev] Queue Management Support in DPDK X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: users-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "users" On Sun, Aug 2, 2020 at 4:43 AM Archit Pandey wrote: > Hi Stephen, > > Thanks for the reply. > > On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 12:37 AM Stephen Hemminger > wrote: > > > > rte_sched is not a generic AQM mechanism. You will have to write a new > > replacement for rte_sched if you want something else. > > Yes, we did realize that rte_sched is not suitable for AQM algorithms. > We have implemented a bare-bones AQM mechanism that is independent of > rte_sched. > Using this implementation we have successfully added and tested PIE and > CoDel. > > > I would recommend starting with Cake. It is latest and most complete > > and the developers are active and friendly. > > CAKE can be added using what we have built, but before we do that we wanted > to know if such a feature would be welcomed by the community. In a word, yes. > Subsequently, we will submit an RFC patch series to the dev mailing list. > > Thanks, > Archit Pandey. > HTH, jdl