From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <jamsphon@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-lf0-f48.google.com (mail-lf0-f48.google.com
 [209.85.215.48]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B98C14C9D
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Fri,  2 Mar 2018 01:36:18 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-lf0-f48.google.com with SMTP id h127so9970221lfg.12
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Thu, 01 Mar 2018 16:36:18 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
 h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=xSBrvcivVMaFViJAWaAOYPL9EHVDm/4CNyJe36PMAWo=;
 b=VWmZNoPHYjc81mS3WxLoyPwI9sTpUGd83AF5R4RljEj37obiKU1oxnFWe1XVfQJL4L
 H0JKDn046QpCoX/1/p2kAPiKjjtB7vupqK/vHUnV2fy5DtgbWAmHvWpMqGsgg8uQoBzq
 nbAit3ag9nF5+F/akjFYHRDtwid6DXwjaoMnTFmyqnjPUtyMvrL4VX+1T1Scbz3vO7KW
 JP+Mxa7j+mCycbLV9K/kqeUDP34XsClAYsUC8ztjxBt4GJUiYZ5woA8onfag36pEp+AF
 rmCMzSuRCtx7tJbuujVUeH26QxY6xxsOubiTTsdTXyBHVAKDO/fE9vANjaIqNrFD5kTE
 DtPA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=xSBrvcivVMaFViJAWaAOYPL9EHVDm/4CNyJe36PMAWo=;
 b=SGMjmS0Mpzg6Yh0vcFcRXdLnU68VTL7rN5e0Pz2yenZKP5bxoMJVLcxvMXZdvY0PBy
 EKk8Ep+jcTH0rimIskn2Zwwvk8c1GWcoPgmbUU6gy8fSgQgG/jcnWL/y7gPa7qvIJvxO
 YkuhqelBVXYNilozO667kfYM5hSHMKxpmAm9mDU5XXL2eEHq9ux2a1mpOzuOICEaNuxD
 lqxdFs7vy3cUKqPR8j/jOwhbNdxQIA8UEpFquicaZn5bLz3Px1UXxiLrEa3zpJanopKO
 3fLNtP59rHWGWutVI2+i3+9aoGlI6bUtCnXrmbfoFYDwjSc0sNTDKHD1jfkB+yUdTcAp
 pdVA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7EJxIwJOLUtIZqVmRNCBCwKG6ZEPvj71S//eCb6FGlXYuyUVFgu
 8dWKdkbWlPZao5YUj8/KKeav+LQKIQLXkim2R1fa9qfT
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELsNzpHohM7Rqzh7l9ZVYEvmSRi55ejRa6M2SK34qXvfAyJ/geOYn6gGXG6N32JXtrtLKsq6ZIrqNuCcjSLXua4=
X-Received: by 10.46.81.25 with SMTP id f25mr2530876ljb.50.1519950978122; Thu,
 01 Mar 2018 16:36:18 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.25.196.139 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Mar 2018 16:35:57 -0800 (PST)
From: James Huang <jamsphon@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2018 16:35:57 -0800
Message-ID: <CAFpuyR4ox=j7a7jHrQsh3aXvfEWe-DX1Azqx_yLaUCTeny+UxA@mail.gmail.com>
To: users@dpdk.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: [dpdk-users]  Intel I350 igb PMD VLAN offload transmition issue?
X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK usage discussions <users.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://dpdk.org/ml/options/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/users/>
List-Post: <mailto:users@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2018 00:36:18 -0000

 Hello,

We're experiencing PMD VLAN offload transmition issue on Intel I350
[8086:1521] NIC.

OS: CentOS 6.5 x64
DPDK 17.05.2
NIC firmware check with Linux ethtool, firmware-version: 1.67, 0x80000dd0,
17.5.10

The VLAN offload receiving portion works fine, could get mbuf
ol_flags=0x1c1, with correct vlan_tci value.

However, on sending time, when set mbuf ol_flags=0x200000000000000 and
vlan_tci value, there is no packet going out on the wire. in the meantime,
dpdk-pdump tool could capture the outgoing packet without vlan tagging.

This issue does not happen if switch the NIC from I350 to X540 10G
interface.

And, if does not use VLAN, I350 works fine, too.

Is the I350 NIC hardware compatible issue, or something else?
Is possible to fix the issue?

Regards,
James Huang

<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
Virus-free.
www.avast.com
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
<#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>