From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <vincent.jardin@6wind.com>
Received: from mail-ob0-f174.google.com (mail-ob0-f174.google.com
 [209.85.214.174]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 905F68D28
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Tue,  9 Feb 2016 16:51:15 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-ob0-f174.google.com with SMTP id ba1so188973308obb.3
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Tue, 09 Feb 2016 07:51:15 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :cc:content-type;
 bh=XI9HwODU5W6ZZDRwHCaqIYYUoL3tLXqrVH/0IiRsTDI=;
 b=sQ6CyK2+2TZOS4afkzpEdwkrPI/Ddqhhu8miUWx9/pX7is/uHi88QybobpODLNZ1DM
 5PEk2zN1nq3QjTMnTtMEa9av5xL/hF3ohTRL8ylLrKdJcOSzsAW3DqGBRjvRmyoxPBUP
 PYU74jqAC8WTj+I1qwZ9kTsl0AsC7CSqlIeOB+WM1BkQEXVuQPxpuNCOVoj9uh/DLYOn
 8WOh4X1OPitE2cEGQvAGZgkutDggiU3JXrnukcJQflZJS/+Xi3HLY4UtW+RKNgfdYGEG
 HQeDcv5kgUKEza06sly8Zgmn4Nui7uUoODarrXjm6Ryp5tjBXsZRI1+AT1uPmHE0WZct
 0OHg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
 :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
 bh=XI9HwODU5W6ZZDRwHCaqIYYUoL3tLXqrVH/0IiRsTDI=;
 b=KIw4mrckEgAgm7hX73E8rTuXLxqDz6q3FAeDVtACUEHwi7IDtoVD29dvsEa3h/8k/A
 NYbuHLWdXVms+8XC0NNJPEpX4YUa8iOvbmBpTMwh4eVY1JYp+SkPbU6DTbNmdxJLO7Sa
 qGNo5VhxaklepqxFW03exLXPQCtjoOoNdRB0fOf6AMtSm15CqRS/2sbRfc+0BYCchl7I
 VE6EeB2n1eTnVtDXoNjGCGmSfgRtVUBDAblFUnCBeXJIYIL3s0cVYT81xp+XFQvxohXO
 F0bVyAJG/sk1t7RiQpK+X18sgD8JzqlkhysSeqt/00DnhmOzvuNUjhQ3Q1BMfsOZ4bPk
 ZUFQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOQSmjz/sFfuDx6fLZIT2Wr0XMrt5Q7UTx9d5OEZPME5S/vNiguFZdX36LsdrSdN6W8nb8EOdlQf8ggFtMZo
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.241.3 with SMTP id we3mr30282498obc.82.1455033075063;
 Tue, 09 Feb 2016 07:51:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.60.10.137 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Feb 2016 07:51:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.60.10.137 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Feb 2016 07:51:14 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAJ2oMh+k4cqqatOJjXabuYacpM5nJ4uAw6JqoouVhs4PFTdwDQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAJ2oMhLE2frG+H2q3O7OFivLSTGZ+MSem8ExpSKTzXxTu8QrBA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJ2oMh+k4cqqatOJjXabuYacpM5nJ4uAw6JqoouVhs4PFTdwDQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 16:51:14 +0100
Message-ID: <CAG8AbRWahidNAGs3__B0Z79wM6Pg_BdsrhJLiKvgixWWJZYTVw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Vincent JARDIN <vincent.jardin@6wind.com>
To: Ran Shalit <ranshalit@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Cc: users@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] Support for cavium Octeon ?
X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: usage discussions <users.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/users/>
List-Post: <mailto:users@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2016 15:51:16 -0000

Le 9 f=C3=A9vr. 2016 09:48, "Ran Shalit" <ranshalit@gmail.com> a =C3=A9crit=
 :
>
>  Does dpdk support Cavium Octeon with PCI express ?
> I see there is Nitrox library, where can I read more about it ?
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 5:05 PM, Ran Shalit <ranshalit@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Does dpdk support Cavium Octeon 73xx ?
> > We need to develop application over PCIe between intel cpu and Cavium
Octeon.
> > I wander if it should work with Cavium Octeon or only with Intel's cpu =
?
> >

Can you explain?

Nitrox is not CN73xx, so why both questions?

6WIND made such support with Nitrox and DPDK. Because of some Nitrox SDK's
constrains, it uses DPDK API under source licensing directly from 6WIND.
Feel free to contact us.

Best regards,
  Vincent