From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27866A0597 for ; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 17:27:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9250E1C29F; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 17:27:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-wm1-f46.google.com (mail-wm1-f46.google.com [209.85.128.46]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E9B11BF4F for ; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 17:27:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm1-f46.google.com with SMTP id f20so162280wmh.3 for ; Thu, 09 Apr 2020 08:27:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=mgTRE/cn6kq1M2ztNoudazsVD/vuuqB213MrMc98abY=; b=X2XIo5QVnBpxPtVxKSJA1/8GAx65olCSDe7IKGVGjupDnmWFcza54eyVzW0fyllHS/ yuN9YKG7rSPydUpSkibMi5JsiwJq2Htz9tFdntMJk69ra4Dge99wyDIxhD97qDdE64G/ +sPVChSpCkvZFZIfDM7BISytnFPMaVYd7C7GOZJ6L5K15nJnKCRGX2Z8Esaw9JfHOuSs d3C002wJyWmNvAEtYJUPLXhf6KAuVKAWl06fFNIM73jjddWQt6J6cT379w0JS+4goVir 07GyCcfI+nnNaXdqafQAa3CZxYAMZyYbBflM5yaTacYsi4cXGexYPhl5gSmfsvHmMana 8T0Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=mgTRE/cn6kq1M2ztNoudazsVD/vuuqB213MrMc98abY=; b=kpop4eh3D6L8J50vGbmYFNmFhkTX3EhprkpY2VZcN+7yRqFuFZOPXfVtGT9fOt/WuY Yip99aTvFbTvLW7PkKF/9DG7qTZqV+UiBAhJz6u9iPleS+CQajtssmhrwxZVcMs31Ufw 2uJ/1iRYD35jtmLkN6zaMVV39TThkMduDEJxAAUsotuvELpw3e440uxGAJ4mW2qP/bNU bMD0g7XEbKYgCJdfshtip2ko9EpVFtrA0ocxfODTwjNI8CmJpMwpiEx16DxO+YOp8mcZ 2cYT5ZwEW/92r9R4EasP6JV/Zqhtvkgyeusn23AulP8PLNuDRdC5S2M3pRUt4wKubF6j sU/A== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuZe1Acy4rbvgyRp8rd1YIYt3SJWMlyNTwRfjzPwnn2L+gY6QaBs IghOJHoLYCvwzepwPbHauHM7WXikqUlbpkl2qmk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypLcUS+XY7K+LS6VoRUDDr/q7rMkWWgg6s07S9tEW4FgOBfNW3+P2x2FMTEWOhg5yWnOwscimMgVRua+888m1r0= X-Received: by 2002:a7b:cfc9:: with SMTP id f9mr413472wmm.137.1586446055934; Thu, 09 Apr 2020 08:27:35 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Shyam Shrivastav Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2020 20:57:19 +0530 Message-ID: To: Cristofer Martins Cc: "users@dpdk.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] General Questions X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: users-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "users" >From my experience as dpdk user On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 11:41 AM Cristofer Martins < CristoferMartins@hotmail.com> wrote: > Well the reason i thought about using dpdk(together with a user space tcp > stack) is because my tcp code spend so much time with syscalls that > removing that would allow better throughput and latency. Is this a valid > reason? My software runs in single core(and most of time in cheap vps) so i > want to extract the best i can from them. > Yes using dpdk instead of getting packets from kernel stack increases performance > The other question is, can dpdk runs alongside with the linux network > stack? I want to use dpdk in my special app but i still want to have ssh > and apps working as expected without any modification. > Interface used by dpdk is not available, at least another interface required for management/access & other network apps > > Thanks in advance. >