From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <users-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A73FDA10DA
	for <public@inbox.dpdk.org>; Sat,  3 Aug 2019 01:02:02 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BE641C2FB;
	Sat,  3 Aug 2019 01:02:02 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail-lf1-f48.google.com (mail-lf1-f48.google.com
 [209.85.167.48]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26E0C1C2F8
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Sat,  3 Aug 2019 01:02:01 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-lf1-f48.google.com with SMTP id u10so15251954lfm.12
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Fri, 02 Aug 2019 16:02:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
 h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=j3nGi/FYJeTVmgvTHBVIrA8u2Cxb6lmn2hESdIhHjNM=;
 b=umwjPFGgPjPXrKrvWbJkea+A3EBCCbkECdYRlLHCAtGVRReRdRRBPnf2d9dECzwzMy
 0ArTceLAgQsQH6GEWu/xqJ5zZ/5C471qFzDmLypO+hHPILYdsExREvF0z+klIDIqAjqM
 UrcVCZNXEcam3BfD6GNDJyQu5PJFEDxDz9focyV8bT/n81wdKiNfEzSNGuLnrCHTheZr
 A6zoEy5a1Hq7H5iOtX6LvK/OQiG+gvBFvX+hAr8HZsGCPzm6TKQ2VWR679J1/fKHxztf
 cG0vFvPksuM9DHwdg5dZXc4GXtvPJQfhUcbi4ZNjxVMYrvIm8wG7Rx1sqx0l4OEoyClq
 MpCQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=j3nGi/FYJeTVmgvTHBVIrA8u2Cxb6lmn2hESdIhHjNM=;
 b=VzXinGg6stoQo7dhLu/5GDmmeshxS3bjfbS3h3mJjipDZAeDR7Pdbjy1ukVKaQXY7Q
 pjLlXGWvz0QL+dI/I3541RB8uDbhhiF11HKJEbDIgY4oVhOX/Emz62UJQxOduszbKnZV
 AwJ8RNxSsekYqJK4fVuMFpETwI9tHrYy30/4/ctH26tbT01xSs+M3DGwnLBwjhLgMquu
 NhqRcx7UcXUBFOS6NFyLoK4OYCu6dwA5H5xhkVp4+AtaJ6AQiA7OMfzRXWsoZdj7/Ycl
 iCUGHesuK6qJrsaP/KNxJA5YoR03I3TlvDKR9WHVphxZRU9EU7/GFxdvzPccPnGUzeJl
 mI4g==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUzlOYQJTC8bVo9pJwqVBrw1KCl3w1dxF6XD6o32NYoWvhXm1U9
 CqC3fds6NEBG3HC/tKRSg505HXT1+o7fuQ6ySGQmDw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwPCUfiZXQF+vKl79RaVCP+iJoyUgbWSOwlbgrsgBITAVSf5rysoczP1C6bx4MI1FYUPSiEvPQDqqhHOoJxrj0=
X-Received: by 2002:ac2:465e:: with SMTP id s30mr19093676lfo.19.1564786920525; 
 Fri, 02 Aug 2019 16:02:00 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Arvind Narayanan <webguru2688@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2019 18:01:49 -0500
Message-ID: <CAHJJQSVnoYbxQw9_UbVbTG-JfpoApUZav248XAw+niwvU4jw4w@mail.gmail.com>
To: users <users@dpdk.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Subject: [dpdk-users] rte_flow multiple queues in same rule's action set
X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK usage discussions <users.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/users/>
List-Post: <mailto:users@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: users-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "users" <users-bounces@dpdk.org>

Hi,

In rte_flow docs, there is an example (Table 11.28) where the action
set consists of 4 actions:

1. queue(index=5)
2. VOID
3. queue(index=3)
4. END
The docs further say such a rule effectively duplicates the traffic to
both queue 3 and 5. Does this mean "two different mbufs" exist for the
same incoming packet, or does it mean it only duplicates the mbuf
references?

Any clarification is appreciated.

Thanks,
Arvind