From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-lf0-f45.google.com (mail-lf0-f45.google.com [209.85.215.45]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE011952 for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 18:15:25 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-lf0-f45.google.com with SMTP id m1so16216328lfg.0 for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 09:15:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nickallen-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=AXbBbKJFDkA7BSkJBFjqHcNMla8pCaOYlvP4sIt7u0k=; b=Hg00EDspbZEqY0wOJWcTVKGwUsetwysSV72MBe5EilSwepDWekGWj8X3IUR1Jqt3dg rk4KAe/9X1aCVIQ2f9cOt8iVf/SIjUxJS0yQOIbECDVfFc01MvxIQlBK6OtSJ5fI2kUd HLN+EYGNqI2TTnsp0LnRAOiCSMoj7Q/YU8iE7i0tdWzuwqarugVuyY8fl6JXiqz+Yttj L89H7rHVBQrzCOmQ0ERLgqewhelV7UnpKRen0oHXle4m3yM9GUnWthqoRBlZDni0z8wb HBYsNiQcEOmW7ex85+7yaBdi/4nCMQyNfmi5+pY9va7IKncxGIfb6idDqHLi1e+EXK41 zOnA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=AXbBbKJFDkA7BSkJBFjqHcNMla8pCaOYlvP4sIt7u0k=; b=heMrkRssc1uAsG510pKbxctkPyMZCzO6TY655rsJiK6W+75THj6tviAlrR/Bff1wIx U+GiSEGwzQdcSKNJsPcpkoUoeoG2TbNAumWusFFN0mRnxnbxOZkxuMWHGQVEzGHLsptY cJRjCPxi25F3RwpPvRQrVCFeTPldLAWhqwILsOylRRXMTnVl9Xvw0wbtdjgVAQvAvnck QQM4H6hsozc7/sIkG4yQH3bwf7ph57Y+IxYe9uSCDG1e+CBLGg+g6Wd8hE69WAOqoRxw N15/nkorv6HUm8u/bzW2OJ3k7EdJtu0UIP7r1SV7DM3Ci+mdZtdkrt4qKPTJmzWwmdH9 kpqw== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YORzuxE9KCE5C1gZnwZdZdTL2+fL0ALIvw615plXmAGobaaiK7DG1R+toVgrNWgrRD68I4x7m1Kl6drZTQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.25.43.212 with SMTP id r203mr17227031lfr.162.1455124525594; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 09:15:25 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.112.52.200 with HTTP; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 09:15:25 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20160210091215.2f0e7081@xeon-e3> References: <20160210091215.2f0e7081@xeon-e3> Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 12:15:25 -0500 Message-ID: From: Nick Allen To: users@dpdk.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] Unable to Bind Device in VirtualBox VM X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 17:15:26 -0000 What is typically used instead of VirtualBox? I'd be happy to try an alternative. Ideally, it would be something that could run across different host operating systems; including OS X and Linux. Thanks for your thoughts. On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > On Wed, 10 Feb 2016 08:45:20 -0500 > Nick Allen wrote: > >> Problem: I am unable to bind a virtual NIC using DPDK 2.2.0 that I >> created inside of a Ubuntu 14.04 guest running in VirtualBox 5.0.14 on >> OS X 10.11.3 on a 2015 Macbook Pro. Here is the error that I am >> seeing. >> > > Do you mean the virtio NIC? > VirtualBox has a non-standard implementation of virtio and I suspect > the feature negotiation isn't working. Could be a virtualbox bug. > > Since virtualbox is not open source, I don't use or test it. -- Nick Allen